superdeterminism.bsky.social
1,111 posts
37 followers
46 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
You ask why or if without asking how.
comment in response to
post
"How" - requires motion. Without it, nothing can come (motion event) into existence.
comment in response to
post
Before you tell me what you think you know, find out what you don't know: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Before you tell me what you think you know, find out what it is that you don't know: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Motion causes existence. Existence cannot cause motion. In other words, everything that exists is an object of motion. Hence, the Final Selection Experiment.
comment in response to
post
They made a movie about the Final Selection Experiment (almost). See Section 8 of the manuscript: doi.org/10.3389/frma... – The movie is called “Final Destination Bloodlines”. Without motion, the result is predetermined.
comment in response to
post
They made a movie about the Final Selection Experiment (almost). See Section 8 of the manuscript: doi.org/10.3389/frma... – The movie is called “Final Destination Bloodlines”. Without motion, the result is predetermined.
comment in response to
post
They made a movie about the Final Selection Experiment (almost). See Section 8 of the manuscript: doi.org/10.3389/frma... – The movie is called “Final Destination Bloodlines”. Without motion, the result is predetermined.
comment in response to
post
Go to my website if you are not a bot. temptdestiny.com/index.html
comment in response to
post
Can AI think without motion? CERN physicists told me that direct and indirect selection are trivial cognitive functions. They, like you, were wrong: www.fundamentaljournals.com/index.php/ij...
comment in response to
post
They made a movie about the Final Selection Experiment (almost). See Section 8 of the manuscript: doi.org/10.3389/frma... – The movie is called “Final Destination Bloodlines”. Without motion, the result is predetermined.
comment in response to
post
They made a movie about the Final Selection Experiment (almost). See Section 8 of the manuscript: doi.org/10.3389/frma... – The movie is called “Final Destination Bloodlines”. Without motion, the result is predetermined.
comment in response to
post
They made a movie about the Final Selection Experiment (almost). See Section 8 of the manuscript: doi.org/10.3389/frma... – The movie is called “Final Destination Bloodlines”. Without motion, the result is predetermined.
comment in response to
post
They made a movie about the Final Selection Experiment (almost). See Section 8 of the manuscript: doi.org/10.3389/frma... – The movie is called “Final Destination Bloodlines”. Without motion, the result is predetermined.
comment in response to
post
They made a movie about the Final Selection Experiment (almost). See Section 8 of the manuscript: doi.org/10.3389/frma... – The movie is called “Final Destination Bloodlines”. Without motion, the result is predetermined.
comment in response to
post
They made a movie about the Final Selection Experiment (almost). See Section 8 of the manuscript: doi.org/10.3389/frma... – The movie is called “Final Destination Bloodlines”. Without motion, the result is predetermined.
comment in response to
post
They made a movie about the Final Selection Experiment (almost). See Section 8 of the manuscript: doi.org/10.3389/frma... – The movie is called “Final Destination Bloodlines”. Without motion, the result is predetermined.
comment in response to
post
They made a movie about the Final Selection Experiment (almost). See Section 8 of the manuscript: doi.org/10.3389/frma... – The movie is called “Final Destination Bloodlines”. Without motion, the result is predetermined.
comment in response to
post
They made a movie about the Final Selection Experiment (almost). See Section 8 of the manuscript: doi.org/10.3389/frma... – The movie is called “Final Destination Bloodlines”. Without motion, the result is predetermined.
comment in response to
post
I don't do guesses, only facts. They made a movie about the Final Selection Experiment (almost). See Section 8 of the manuscript: doi.org/10.3389/frma... – The movie is called “Final Destination Bloodlines”.
comment in response to
post
What made-up nonsense are you referring to?
comment in response to
post
How much does a selection weigh, what is its scale, and where was it located when you used it to observe and measure these words? - temptdestiny.com/pdf/MAR-L04-...
comment in response to
post
I already have. What you do with this information is up to you. Enough said.
comment in response to
post
Theodore, Sabine is very knowledgeable of what she knows. However, she is not knowledgeable of fundamental mechanics, i.e., superdeterminism, as she claims. I shared my findings with a multi-billion dollar investment company and others about investing in quantum mechanics: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Motion crates states of existence, existence, either physical or spiritual, cannot create anything. In other words, we understand nature ass-backward.
comment in response to
post
See Section 8 to confirm for yourself if the laws of nature supersede philosophy. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
This is about the laws of nature. To test if this is about "psychobabble," you can conduct the Final Selection Experiment for yourself to prove that nature is wrong and you are right. See Section 8 for confirmation: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Exactly what you are talking about.
comment in response to
post
The programming is the logic we use to understand things. When we do not have knowledge of what is, we then believe what we do not know. When you have knowledge of what is, belief is irrelevant.
comment in response to
post
Ah, I see our disconnect. I am not talking about philosophy. I am talking about the fundamental mechanics of how nature works based on unambiguous empirical evidence, not theory.
comment in response to
post
This is what makes direct and indirect selection predetermined nonlocal variables necessary for the existence of their effect. In other words, we understand nature ass backward.
comment in response to
post
This is what makes direct and indirect selection, predetermined nonlocal variables, necessary for the existence of their effects. In other words, we understand nature ass-backward.
comment in response to
post
The logic that physical (local) or spiritual (nonlocal) existence is shared by both science and religion. They both use existence as a causal function. However, unambiguous empirical evidence confirms the functions of motion can only come to exist, not preexist nonlocally or be locally existent.
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? The logic of both science and religion is that existence is causal, while the laws of nature correlate with the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Religion is mankind's first science. Then came empirical methods. However...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? The logic of both science and religion is that existence is causal, while the laws of nature correlate with the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? The logic of both science and religion is that existence is causal, while the laws of nature correlate with the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? The logic of both science and religion is that existence is causal, while the laws of nature correlate with the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? The logic of both science and religion is that existence is causal, while the laws of nature correlate with the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? The logic of both science and religion is that existence is causal, while the laws of nature correlate with the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? The logic of both science and religion is that existence is causal, while the laws of nature correlate with the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? The logic of both science and religion is that existence is causal, while the laws of nature correlate with the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...