superdeterminism.bsky.social
1,048 posts
33 followers
25 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
Think of choice as a programming language for the brain to interpret external stimuli. One program uses states of existence as a causal function. The other uses motion as a causal function. Both functions are mutually exclusive. This is why we are blind to the laws of nature.
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on the same code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Thank you. Knowledge all boils down to answering a key question: How do we know what we think we know?
May I suggest reviewing the APS presentation? I tried to make the logic involved easier to understand. temptdestiny.com/pdf/MAR-L04-...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Did you know that the human brain uses two mutually exclusive logic codes to make sense of the outside world? Both science and religion are based on one code, while nature uses the other. Which one do you think is valid? See Section 5: doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Empirical evidence that the activities of human beings exhibit a wave function within a single slit envelope would be BIG NEWS for particle physicists. Do you know of any?
comment in response to
post
Sadly, Sabine, I am not joking. You are not the authority on this topic, as you have not tested it as I initially did back in 2000 and for eleven subsequent years. See the recent APS Global Physics Summit presentation of the Method of Everything manuscript: temptdestiny.com/pdf/MAR-L04-...
comment in response to
post
I see that you are hawking QM courses that propagate outdated information. Science, as you know, is not dogma. Propagating falsified information as valid is misleading. You talk as if you're above this. Apparently, I was wrong. Evidence of Superdeterminism voids your courses doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
I see by how you set up your profile that each time you post a comment, you are spamming your website and book – EACH TIME. You advocate: Do as I say, not what I do. No thanks.
comment in response to
post
Fascinating how AI generates different answers each time.
comment in response to
post
Einstein was correct! At the American Physical Society Global Physics Summit, I presented unambiguous empirical evidence of superdeterminism (see presentation - temptdestiny.com), which means that quantum mechanics is not a fundamental theory, and that the methods used in science are backward.
comment in response to
post
Einstein was correct! At the American Physical Society Global Physics Summit, I presented unambiguous empirical evidence of superdeterminism (see presentation - temptdestiny.com), which means that quantum mechanics is not a fundamental theory, and that the methods used in science are backward.
comment in response to
post
I agree with you. However, I found that asking the right question is the most important. The rest follows. For example: How do we know what we think we know? Understand the mechanics involved first. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
What search engine did you use? Did you use quote marks before and after “Method of Everything”