superdeterminism.bsky.social
1,007 posts
32 followers
25 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
Empirical evidence that the activities of human beings exhibit a wave function within a single slit envelope would be BIG NEWS for particle physicists. Do you know of any?
comment in response to
post
Sadly, Sabine, I am not joking. You are not the authority on this topic, as you have not tested it as I initially did back in 2000 and for eleven subsequent years. See the recent APS Global Physics Summit presentation of the Method of Everything manuscript: temptdestiny.com/pdf/MAR-L04-...
comment in response to
post
I see that you are hawking QM courses that propagate outdated information. Science, as you know, is not dogma. Propagating falsified information as valid is misleading. You talk as if you're above this. Apparently, I was wrong. Evidence of Superdeterminism voids your courses doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
I see by how you set up your profile that each time you post a comment, you are spamming your website and book – EACH TIME. You advocate: Do as I say, not what I do. No thanks.
comment in response to
post
Fascinating how AI generates different answers each time.
comment in response to
post
Einstein was correct! At the American Physical Society Global Physics Summit, I presented unambiguous empirical evidence of superdeterminism (see presentation - temptdestiny.com), which means that quantum mechanics is not a fundamental theory, and that the methods used in science are backward.
comment in response to
post
Einstein was correct! At the American Physical Society Global Physics Summit, I presented unambiguous empirical evidence of superdeterminism (see presentation - temptdestiny.com), which means that quantum mechanics is not a fundamental theory, and that the methods used in science are backward.
comment in response to
post
I agree with you. However, I found that asking the right question is the most important. The rest follows. For example: How do we know what we think we know? Understand the mechanics involved first. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
What search engine did you use? Did you use quote marks before and after “Method of Everything”
comment in response to
post
Did I ask you? If knowledge is not of interest, I apologize for the inconvenience.
comment in response to
post
When you spread information or your opinions, are you not spamming? Sharing knowledge with those who wish to learn is what social media is about. I apologize for the inconvenience.
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are backward. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than RFK Jr.? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are backward. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most Bluesky scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are backward. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are backward. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than RFK Jr.? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are backward. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are backward. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are backward. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are backward. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are backward. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are backward. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are backward. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are backward. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are backward. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are backward. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are backward. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are backward. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
As a fellow artist and scientist living in the Philly area, I trust you will find how I used art to confirm superdeterminism (destiny). The findings later went on to invalidate a Nobel Prize in Physics: temptdestiny.com/index.html
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than RFK Jr.? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Almost? Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter RFK Jr.? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than Trump? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than RFK Jr.? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter (gayer) than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...
comment in response to
post
Is AI smarter than most scientists? If you do a “Method of Everything” keyword search (use quote marks) at Google and DuckDuckGo, you will find that the AI-assisted answer is smarter than scientists who refuse to accept that the methods used in science are incomplete. doi.org/10.3389/frma...