Profile avatar
swanmichaels.bsky.social
Writer: DO YOU REMEMBER BEING BORN? 💐 (2023), THE WAGERS (2019), US CONDUCTORS (2014) • Founded 🎶 http://saidthegramophone.com • http://www.byseanmichaels.com • he/him
73 posts 829 followers 310 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
reveals so much about a person to see them struggling with something tbh ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/214...
comment in response to post
wow, thank you so much for reading, jen—and for saying that.
comment in response to post
beautttiful!!!
comment in response to post
But everyone always has to go through a primary. (For most popular incumbents though—like Biden against Dean Phillips in 2024—it's usually a technicality.)
comment in response to post
Yes, "getting primaried" = mounting surprising (and potentially counter-productive) opposition to someone in the primary. For instance, as in 2018 or 2020, MAGA folk might "primary" (and unseat) a popular candidate, in favour of an extremist—and then lose that seat in the subsequent election.
comment in response to post
Primaries take place to select/confirm candidates before every general election.
comment in response to post
I'm using the Democratic example, but obviously the main please this lever is used in the USA these days is by Trump, who uses primary threats to intimidate even popular Republicans who might stand against him.
comment in response to post
Imagine you are a centrist Democrat who wins >50% of the vote by appealing to most Ds, some Rs, and independents. Even if you consistently win general elections, you might be vulnerable in a primary to extremely motivated Ds on an issue like Gaza.
comment in response to post
To win a general election you generally have to play to the centre (bc most voters are in the centre) but far fewer people vote in primary elections, so even incumbents are vulnerable if a wing of the party is particularly motivated (or incited) to vote against them.
comment in response to post
Ah! (And thank you!) I tend to miss the substack discourse. I think you're right to point out the way gadget-lovers believe in a false technological determinism, and I'm not experimenting with LLMs much myself right now, but i do think it's hard to predict what's a synthesizer and what's a theremin.
comment in response to post
is there anyone smart actually saying individual writers all "need to embrace AI"? or just expressing skepticism for the inverse, that all writers should oppose it? most established artists seem lined up as skeptics, which is fine, but literature benefits when people experiment
comment in response to post
Isn't it just that we Canadians can't see NPR posts because of the news block?
comment in response to post
woooo!!! fog!
comment in response to post
Thank you!!!
comment in response to post
I love that!!
comment in response to post
so happy you like it!
comment in response to post
❤️
comment in response to post
the trompe l'oeil smoke on Seething Song is great
comment in response to post
interesting, i'll check it out!
comment in response to post
my pleasure!!
comment in response to post
haha, yes! and i appreciate this version of the 90s a lot more than the one that was emerging five years ago, for some reason
comment in response to post
thank you so much for reading my book!
comment in response to post
the explanation is obviously a lie—but i do wonder if he genuinely regrets it now
comment in response to post
we're old!
comment in response to post
oh, thank you so much, jeremy!!! happy new year!!
comment in response to post
lol
comment in response to post
the whole armlock album's great, like this weird collision between Pinback and Alex G.
comment in response to post
Thank you so much for reading, Chad! And for telling people about my book.
comment in response to post
indeed!
comment in response to post
That's so kind of you, thank you Ivor! Enjoy.
comment in response to post
Il m'a fallu un moment pour comprendre, mais je vous remercie tellement d'avoir mentionnĂŠ mon travail sur les ondes !
comment in response to post
gah, what a thing—a shiver through time, thank you!