thedeckdrmtg.bsky.social
An analyst of Magic: The Gathering from a Commander perspective.
322 posts
118 followers
352 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Try Commander. It's relatively safe here.
comment in response to
post
Archenemy
comment in response to
post
Correct. It's similar to how auras would work. If you put two "Holy Strength" auras on a creature and one of them gets removed, only the buff from that particular "Holy Strength" goes away.
comment in response to
post
I agree. Mostly because it's a card that *can* be very abusable and leads to problematic interactions. I do believe Braids and Gifts will eventually fall off, just because those cards are more chill in current environments and that's not likely won't change.
comment in response to
post
Oh, I know it's not accurate. It's just a funny thing to point out. Like my zombie deck has an infinite combo in it, and it's sitting in Bracket 1, apparently. Lol
comment in response to
post
According to Manabox, the only precon from this year that sits in Bracket 2 is "Creative Energy" from MH3. All the others are in Bracket 1.
comment in response to
post
Remember when 'X-Men 3' was the worst we could get in film? I miss those days...
comment in response to
post
Holy crap, that looks delicious!
comment in response to
post
Lol. Well, you got me there!
comment in response to
post
The funny thing is I'm more of a red player. Lol
comment in response to
post
I did forget to mention in the article that that's one positive about the game changers list. People who prefer to play in brackets 1 and 2 don't have to worry about the crazy power cards that could wind up there. While players in bracket 3 have to get creative with the list and find alternatives
comment in response to
post
I do the same thing with token I use, for simplicity sake. Why don't you like Endure?
comment in response to
post
I'm actually of the stance that we shouldn't get more Talismans. They're just bad mana rocks. But you do bring up a good point with "Three Visits". I'll have to remember that for the next batch of deck revisions.
comment in response to
post
You'll notice that I didn't do a consultation hour on this deck, just because I found it so borked that I'd basically have to rebuild 1/3 of the deck. I usually give myself a cap of 12 to 15 cards for the sake of simplicity.
comment in response to
post
It's not a deck that I would run, either. Not really my general play style. But that's the point of having an objective standard; I have to put my personal biases aside for the sake of analyzing the quality.
comment in response to
post
And you don't *have* to use the terrible Delve aspect of Teval. So, you may have something here.
comment in response to
post
Mardu!
comment in response to
post
Relentless Rats!
comment in response to
post
Really good! Much fan!
comment in response to
post
Legit. Just an idea, but I'd love to see your take on Temur Storm with the new Harmonize spells. That could be interesting...
comment in response to
post
I've got a couple ideas. Definitely gonna rebuild my dragon deck. Wanna build another Isshin deck with mardu's Mobilize.
What about you?
comment in response to
post
Right, because it has nothing to do with the casting decisions and the script...
comment in response to
post
Memnarch
comment in response to
post
The doctor is in!
comment in response to
post
Now, is it more objective than the previous system? Sure. I'm all for a more defined system for determining power level. All they've done is make a system to determine how toxic a deck can be; which is not the same thing. Win cons are much more than land denial and infinite combos.
comment in response to
post
Are you going the O-Ring route, or self-exile?
comment in response to
post
A new friend for "Isochron Scepter"!