theincitatus.bsky.social
A better consul.
195 posts
72 followers
279 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Marvel Premier was off the hook - one of my favorite books. You never knew quite what kind of story you were gonna get.
comment in response to
post
He’s probably already en route to Louisiana.
comment in response to
post
As you say, Mabel.
comment in response to
post
One thing the merch could clear up: spelling.
Werner v Warner?
Dohr v. Dore v. Door?
comment in response to
post
I’m hoping for some Timmy Werner merch, personally.
comment in response to
post
What got me as the w dad to mixed kids: “you’re mixed, you’ll never understand”.
It’s a little thing, and one I really can’t evaluate as neither, but the curse of the hapa strikes again.
Worth watching.
comment in response to
post
Alfred Hitchcock’s got her covered.
comment in response to
post
He’s a veteran of Kobach’ Kansas ag team, and a former ausa in Trump 1.
Also born in India, and a Maj. in the AF reserves.
comment in response to
post
Sure, shadow docket orders, but those really have not been reasoned opinions.
Remember that amid the gross incompetents we see daily, there are some folks that take a very long view on the executive power debate.
comment in response to
post
Possibly setting up a circuit split forcing SCOTUS to address the power to hear the habeas petitions?
The fight currently seems to be if the jurisdiction stripping statute applies, and I think I know how the 5th will rule. I don’t think we’ve see any circuit weigh in yet, tho.
comment in response to
post
There are federal convictions for some of three of the involved officers - deprivation under color with BI and conspiracy to obstruct.
This is why we *had* federal civil rights laws - the southern states couldn’t be trusted to prosecute or convict blatant excessive force.
comment in response to
post
Construction litigator here:
Disputes happen between contractors and design professionals.
All the time.
Even between two highly competent counterparties - buildings are complicated, and the fact of a dispute says zero about either other than the fact they have a dispute.
comment in response to
post
That footprint wouldn’t fit on Alcatraz imo. You’d really need to go thin and up.
comment in response to
post
They’re not tall because they tend to have land around them, at least here in CA. Cheaper to construct than going vertical.
The twin towers jail in LA looks to have 5 stories the above ground floor for cells.
comment in response to
post
Towers. Kinda his thing.
So, he’ll build a vertical tower prison and stiff all the contractors.
comment in response to
post
You should root for the skates. She’s probably treat us to a Taco Bell extravaganza in the desert if she wins. Us?
Laughing bearded man.gif.
comment in response to
post
I see. Your “that dad”. Got it.
comment in response to
post
Seriously. My Lexus, your Porsche, Jen’s roller skates. Totally fair.
comment in response to
post
Can we tontine? 5k entry fee. Whadda ya say?
comment in response to
post
It’s the rivulets of sweat from your hot brain evaporating?
comment in response to
post
Look, this is Trump. This is what he does - see the iterations of the Muslim Ban in series 1.
Having read JAV, it appears that ruling leaves the door open for Trump to revise his proclamation to evade further review.
comment in response to
post
My clients do not share your wisdom.
comment in response to
post
I do this, but when the specific subject of the thread has moved on from the re line.
So we’re done with the surety’s tender but need to discuss discovery? Change the re line even tho it’s the same general subject.
comment in response to
post
Are you aware of any habeus petitions filed/heard/decided in LA?
I share the concern that the 5th and the district courts are less likely to grant, but … have we seen it yet?
comment in response to
post
When was the last time you saw a toc/outline for an opinion, much less a district ct ruling? That I also like, and wish gains traction. Not needed in a 10-20 pager, but here? Helpful.
comment in response to
post
Non substantively - I like this Judges writing style. It’s both approachable and clear.
There’s a bit too much repetition, but that is in service to reading some discrete parts and not the whole.
comment in response to
post
How it started / how it's going.
comment in response to
post
Wait until you find out who was able to first grow ‘em on commercial scale: Walter Knott.
Perhaps you’ve heard of Knotts Berry Farm?
comment in response to
post
As I recall: fraud on the court! Deliberately misrepresentation of facts/evidence!
I was hot. And it wasn’t his client.
I learned.
comment in response to
post
I drafted a brief calling OC a liar as a baby lawyer - I was ticked!
The partner took me to the woodshed, because he was even more ticked (at me).
Not a hard lesson really.
comment in response to
post
Can courts require nominal bonds to avoid this?
comment in response to
post
…and the Lutheran Church.
I know the spotsclips franchisor from HS sports. Not in the least surprised.
comment in response to
post
Fwiw - I don’t think this should apply, but cops gonna cop.
I’m trying, and failing, to imagine any private path that goes from a busisness district to your abode.
Maybe Bren did?
comment in response to
post
The chp has some thoughts.
www.instagram.com/p/CxBEC6PLh-d/
comment in response to
post
Not that certain justices don’t ignore the record when it’s convenient.
comment in response to
post
I think the march memo will also start to show as submissions for the PI’s - it’s only partially superseded on notice. Each case has to make their record because we don’t know which one the sups will grant cert for. And yes, I know you know this point.
comment in response to
post
I read and write for a living, basically - so my rec reading is exclusively fiction. I listen at 1x to enjoy the performance, generally, and 2x only on second “reads”.
I am also very picky about the audiobook artists - I’ll listen to a book I wouldn’t otherwise based on that talent.
comment in response to
post
How do you possibly have so much time to read (listen)? Crank up the speed, or just listen while you’re drawing?
I’m both impressed and irked at your rate is what I’m sayin’.
comment in response to
post
This was the article
Check out this article from USA TODAY:
Exclusive: DOJ memo offers blueprint to Tren de Aragua deportation plan
www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...
comment in response to
post
I haven’t seen any comment on this DOJ memo from March. It’s appalling - note the arrest and lack of judicial review sections.
Source: USA Today.
www.documentcloud.org/documents/25...