thermite.au
I create tech solutions that nearly always mostly work
533 posts
197 followers
236 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Well, for one, the tech works. Is it perfect? Nope. But it works really well. It will 100% replace chunks of the workforce and displaced them from society. It will aggregate wore wealth to the top. They know all this. There just isn't any other option but to go all in, and hope you come out on top.
comment in response to
post
People talking about user count or engagement fail to see the most important issue with this platform. Where is the revenue. Bluesky is burning cash and needs to make a profit.
If they don't find a revenue source, it will either get shut down or, more likely, sold.
comment in response to
post
So to summarise, this was not "AI", at best, you could describe it as machine learning. It has a very simplistic set of variables. Nobody could even agree what bias was, and the humans appear to have made just as many mistakes as the code.
comment in response to
post
Because most kids (humans) are really stupid, and the shitty school system is already struggling to teach them basic literacy.
comment in response to
post
I assume you are referring to AI? If so, it's impossible to regulate this tech. You can write some laws that won't achieve anything, but that's not the same. On top of that, the US government knows it can't afford to lose the race to another country.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, that's not going to happen.
comment in response to
post
I'm only up to page 20 of 300 or so, but these guys are real geniuses. Groundbreaking stuff like;
"This introductory chapter looks at the broader context of the rise of AI and makes the link between energy and AI".
Was there something else they thought servers ran on?
comment in response to
post
Even now, most Americans don't get it. I saw a prominent person on Bluesky saying that the soldiers would never shoot civilians. My friend, your soldiers have been shooting brown, yellow, and black civilians for longer than I've been alive. It's a core part of the economy.
comment in response to
post
Entire continents of people have been on the receiving end of this version of America. People have written libraries worth of books about it. It's just been ok until that treatment turned inwards.
comment in response to
post
There is absolutely zero chance of avoiding the 2° increase. The only thing that slowed our fossil fuel use was covid.
comment in response to
post
Some people stay relevant right to the end, most dont though. Idealy, there wouldn't be a need for bias towards either end of the age spectrum, but it doesn't pan out that way. In a world of aging populations, those least invested in the future, those least adaptable, have the greatest influence.
comment in response to
post
And they still believe this. They still fear a tyrannical government. You've made the mistake of thinking you, and they, agree on what a tyrant is. They want guns because they fear YOUR government. They fear your tyrant. Theirs is just fine.
comment in response to
post
As for laws, society should not make laws for those aging out, nor pander to their feelings. Those people won't be here to suffer the laws. Pass laws for your children and grandchildren. They are the ones who will have to find a gendered bathroom; long after elder generations are dead.
comment in response to
post
Mental flexibility, the ability to challenge your own thoughts, learn, become something new. These are core to being a human being. Once you don't have that, you're just an animal and dead weight. Sadly, most people can't see they have outlived their use-by-date.
comment in response to
post
The technology industry has always cannibalised its own. AI is simply accelerating the process. Unfortunately, it's come at a time when we have pushed a lot of people into the industry with expectations of a long career. This impact will get a lot worse, and those jobs are never coming back.
comment in response to
post
This article can be summed up with "im getting old and the world has moved past me, waaaaaaaah 😭"
Either adapt, or fuck off. Old people feeling butt hurt and unable to adapt to change has caused more than enough suffering already
comment in response to
post
Reading through articles used to be a whole lot slower, though
comment in response to
post
Regardless of his killer being motivated by Jonathan being gay or having mental health issues, who the fuck thinks like this?
comment in response to
post
People are so horrible. Saw this comment by a neighbour in a news article;
"I'm so sad it had to come to this," she said. "We all knew it was going to end up like this because of his antics. It's sad cause this could have been prevented if he had gotten the help he needed."
What the actual fuck
comment in response to
post
At least the LLM can write fucking unit tests. I'll take LLM "slop" with unit tests over testless, human code any day.
comment in response to
post
The only difference between vibe coding and most code out there is the speed of development. The majority of software solutions are a security nightmare and that's with trained developers. Vibe just let's product owners cut out the middleman (developer).
comment in response to
post
AI that cites, is trying to back up its prediction by citing evidence. The problem being, the search results dont match. But it can't dismiss them because search is the product and they are selling the ads. It creates an obvious disconnect. Just like this example.
comment in response to
post
It's typically far more accurate and reliable but can make mistakes.
AI search problem: there's two kinds. One summarises search results, and the other uses search to veryify/cite.
If the search results are lies, it summarises lies. Its just speeding up the process of you reading pages of bullshit
comment in response to
post
Search indexes react to occurrence, relevance and popularity. At best you could say that search relies on humans establishing factuality via popularity. Which sadly doesn't work.
AI problem: it is fed the entire internet, which is filled with lies. So they try to bias towards reliable sources.
comment in response to
post
It's an interesting problem, and not an easy one to fix.
The facts: apples dont contain lycopene.
The bullshit: health sites say it does because of red apples. They are selling the antioxidants story.
The search problem: search indexing does nothing to deal with the accuracy of data.
comment in response to
post
Would it make any difference if they did?
comment in response to
post
This article is a pile of garbage. Not only is it morally bankrupt and lacking logical reasoning, but it still wouldn't win votes. Do a find and replace of trans with black, and you'll see how stupid this article is.
comment in response to
post
I'm not sure we should expect anything different, considering male humans are the apex predators on the planet.
comment in response to
post
The number sounds impressive, but it isn't. Crops have a standard rate of .1mg per kg. That's 99900% higher than the allowed level in drinking water. Tea leaves have a conderably higher rate, and people happily drink that daily.
comment in response to
post
This fine is less than 5% of their liquidity. They had revenue of over £2.5B last year.
They couldn't give one fuck about a £150M fine.
comment in response to
post
No, the failure rates is about the same, but the launch rate is higher. Particularly by the US. In 1975 the US made 30 orbital launches, in 2024, they made 158.
comment in response to
post
I love that game 😀 Your image is a perfect match for the vibe.
comment in response to
post
They are not assessing anything. They know exactly how to achieve this, and its what they are already pushing.
- Remove access to contraception
- Remove access to abortion
They don't care how miserable the parents and children are. Just that they exist.
comment in response to
post
Everyone knows how and its not technically difficult. It generally fails for three reasons.
The product team / company just doesn't give a fuck.
Older stakeholders that insist on doing desktop first/only.
Sites that just don't work well on mobiles. Things like large or complex tables, forms.
comment in response to
post
The family actively enabled and funded an anti LGBTQ institution. The school always hated lesbians, their religion always hated lesbians.
Now, she is upset because that hate impacts her personally?
Get fucked.
comment in response to
post
This is a misleading statement. They did not take her diploma, they had threatened to take her diploma.
Regardless, I have zero sympathy. Her parents willingly sent her to a private Christian school, and she happily went.
comment in response to
post
They either directly or indirectly kill them.
comment in response to
post
Lol, i wish democrats had half the energy of this post.
comment in response to
post
Look, AI has its issues, but i did parent teacher night at my kids' private school, and childcare is one of their best features. Low drug use and violence, average standards. Teachers are meh, but get the job done. The bar for AI is already very low.
comment in response to
post
Kids will spend far more time on gaming than tiktok. Snapchat gets attention, but discord is invisible.
All of which have no age verification enforcement beyond a ticket box/entered age. So how are you going g to enforce a curfew? Just for the honest kids that gave a real age?
comment in response to
post
This is a pile of word salad and political outrage for points. These things would be a lot more interesting if it came with actual details on how they would implement these things. They also focus on popular talk g points like social media and ignore things like gaming.
comment in response to
post
Tax requirements force the data to be gathered, but that doesn't excuse the shit site design. Build the ui to minimise friction. Address search and fill would be a good start.
comment in response to
post
What commitments have they announced as a party, to reverse the funding cuts, restore jobs, shift agencies back to sane science-based policies, restore women's rights, and protect minorities?
Don't assume they will. Outrage is cheap; repairing the Trump damage will be very fucking expensive.
comment in response to
post
Of course it's incredibly difficult to get something like this changed, even if the democrats wanted to, but not impossible. But they won't even try, it's not in their interest.