transradioukandrea.bsky.social
Trans woman, I stand for all human rights and for democracy and true justice. I stand for a free Scotland away from Westminister dictatorship. Against all forms of conversion torture. Supporting the trans community
366 posts
1,109 followers
1,373 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
4. Privacy and Data Protection
o Taking and disseminating images of individuals in a private setting without consent could also violate privacy rights and UK data protection law, particularly under the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018.
comment in response to
post
o Photographing individuals based on appearance, and sharing such images online, could lead to such charges.
comment in response to
post
3. Harassment and Public Order Offences
o Under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and Public Order Act 1986, actions that cause alarm, harassment, or distress can be criminal, especially when targeted or repeated.
comment in response to
post
o Publicly urging others to take potentially illegal actions — such as photographing strangers in restrooms — may qualify as incitement or encouragement under this Act.
comment in response to
post
2. Encouraging or Assisting Crime – Serious Crime Act 2007
o Sections 44–46 make it a criminal offence to intentionally encourage or assist another person to commit an offence.
comment in response to
post
o Photographing anyone in a public restroom without their knowledge or permission may fall under this statute, regardless of the photographer’s intent.
comment in response to
post
JK Rowlings inciting people to commit a criminal offence.
1. Voyeurism – Sexual Offences Act 2003
o Section 67 of this Act makes it a criminal offence to record or observe someone in a private place (e.g., a public toilet) without their consent for the purpose of viewing them in a state of privacy.
comment in response to
post
I think you meant the EHRC (Equalities and Human Rights Commission) as aposed to ECHR European Convention on Human Rights or ECtHR European Courts of Human Rights. It does get confusing but we must try to get this right so as to avoid further confusion.
comment in response to
post
Thank you Katy, you have not been cringe or self serving, you have been honest and open. The vast majority of the community are feeling exactly the same regardless of when they started their transition.Take the time you need when you need it, being on the front line is tough breaks are required.
comment in response to
post
I have also noted that they are not providing an email confirmation of submission which is standard practice for these online consultations. Making it easier to deny a submission has been made if they don't like the answers provided.
comment in response to
post
You should have had email confirmation of your submission, which is the standard practice but I know I didn't receive one so I don't have confirmation of submitting either.
This could be their way of avoiding entries they don't like.
comment in response to
post
Even their own website says she's lying
bsky.app/profile/jake...
comment in response to
post
It will also discriminate against women with children of the opposite sex out and about trying to find a suitable bathroom. The guidance is truly flawed and should be withdrawn immediately.
comment in response to
post
Sorry to say this Sara but it is in black and white on the EHRC's website as part of their flawed guidance. Dont' take my word for it, check it out for yourself. I see you have reposted about the guidance several times so you should have a link to it.
comment in response to
post
thus a mother cannot take her son or a father cannot take his daughter to the bathroom unless it is a designated mixed sex facility. Though the EHRC have failed to mention this in their guidance most likely to prevent the backlash from parent groups who will be affected by this.
comment in response to
post
Some will argue that this is not the case but a child who has been assigned male at birth under the terms of the ruling is “biological male” and for a child that is assigned female at birth is “biological female”,
comment in response to
post
If a venue allows a parent to take their opposite sex child into the facilities it then becomes a mixed sex facility for the purposes of this guidance and the law under the EA 2010.
comment in response to
post
Like wise parents would not be allowed to take their child of the opposite sex into a toilet designated as a single sex space in a restaurant, café, cinema. They would have to use a facility such as a disabled bathroom which is designated as gender neutral placing a major burden on the parent.
comment in response to
post
So, for parents wishing to take their child swimming in a public swimming pool, child requires adult assistance to change then unless the changing facilities are designated as “Mixed Sex” a mother wouldn't be allowed to take their son, or a father to take their daughter into the changing rooms.
comment in response to
post
• in some circumstances the law also allows trans women (biological men) not to be permitted to use the men’s facilities, and trans men (biological woman) not to be permitted to use the women’s facilities.”
comment in response to
post
• trans women (biological men) should not be permitted to use the women’s facilities and trans men (biological women) should not be permitted to use the men’s facilities, as this will mean that they are no longer single-sex facilities and must be open to all users of the opposite sex
comment in response to
post
The EHRC targets parents and children of the opposite sex.
EHRC (the Equalities and Human Rights Commission) issued disappointing interim guidance on how organisations should interpret the Supreme Court ruling.
The guidance states that, “In workplaces and services that are open to the public: