witswhatwits.bsky.social
Too politically aware for my own good. And sports.
242 posts
297 followers
373 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Again!?!
comment in response to
post
He is the enemy within.
comment in response to
post
Nah. Some of the GWOTs are the worst of the “Thank me for my service”, “if you’re not a conservative, you’re a traitor Commie bastard” around. Those older white men are mostly ‘nam vets with a healthier skepticism toward any political party or ideology.
comment in response to
post
If this isn’t the federal government attack the 2A folks were warning us about, I don’t know what is.
comment in response to
post
Which DOJ is that, exactly? The one that helped get us here?
comment in response to
post
Start with the J6 lists.
comment in response to
post
She wasn’t talking about THOSE special interests, silly.
comment in response to
post
4 words for Mr Clooney:
Gym Jordan
President Biden
comment in response to
post
“Officially”. Wanna bet it happens anyway?
comment in response to
post
Guns don’t kill people. People kill people.
comment in response to
post
Why are they new hires, not recalls? Seems extra-inefficient.
comment in response to
post
Cowards.
comment in response to
post
I believe Rooney is a free agent, therefore both unprotectable and undraftable. Protecting both Coyne AND Stecklein seems short-sighted.
comment in response to
post
He should have thought of that during both impeachment votes.
comment in response to
post
And MAGAs giving credit for all economic “improvements” to their leader, even though it will be recovery from the damage he and his underlings have caused.
comment in response to
post
That too.
comment in response to
post
Did I say all?
comment in response to
post
Has anybody else come to the realization that far too many Cuban exiles never hated dictatorship, only that it wasn’t “their” dictator.
comment in response to
post
Evidence says otherwise.
comment in response to
post
May they come back to haunt their pro-dictatorship loved ones.
comment in response to
post
Dude, that case was about the formerly independent agencies. The specific protection of ONLY the Fed doesn’t make it any better.
Also, take your fascist self elsewhere.
comment in response to
post
I did suspect that.
comment in response to
post
Stop infantilizing politicians. She made her choices and is no victim.
comment in response to
post
www.scotusblog.com/2025/05/supr...
comment in response to
post
The MAGA crowd will embrace the suffering and death as their patriotic duty as long as the minorities suffer too.
comment in response to
post
Given the source and the hero-take, that is actually pretty unsurprising.
comment in response to
post
But they will help, so they can all be “bipartisan”. We’re not supposed to notice that all the mechanisms for implementation no longer exist.
comment in response to
post
Exactly 3 of them will vote “no”. Which 3? TBD - they haven’t drawn straws yet.
comment in response to
post
Can’t wait for Gen X to spend down mommy and daddy’s assets only to find out there’s no Medicaid to pay for their care.
comment in response to
post
Or at the very least, a hiring requirement vis-a-vis the folks with a work requirement.
comment in response to
post
Lol. SCOTUS will rule away their own relevance as long as the checks keep coming and appearances can be maintained. Mostly, they already have.
comment in response to
post
Honestly, didn’t expect them to sacrifice the wht Europeans for credibility.
comment in response to
post
Is it just me or does it magically keep “falling” but never really changes? I’d swear last week it was 38%.
comment in response to
post
“The Pb” with JT.
comment in response to
post
Without a viable third party qualified on ballots in all 50 states, this is simply further poisons the well.
comment in response to
post
Whoop-de-doo. It’s not like Van Hollen can take his vote back. Did he take Susan Collins pills on the day of the confirmation vote?
comment in response to
post
You read right. Traitors and thieves, the lot of them.
comment in response to
post
Wrong side of the river, but yeah, nobody needs a tornado.
comment in response to
post
If they were “normal”, they’d be ex-Republicans.
comment in response to
post
What exactly does this “fighting back” look like? Serious question because it’s pretty invisible.
comment in response to
post
And that would still be a better win percentage than they currently have.
comment in response to
post
“Enforcement” seems like lipstick on a pig, doesn’t it?
comment in response to
post
He literally sounded exactly like what he was accusing you of being, so it seemed appropriate.
comment in response to
post
Whatever. You commented, Canes fan commented, I replied to Canes fan’s empty criticism of your take. How’d you figure you were the target, gender assumptions?
comment in response to
post
Bring something other than insults and empty fangirling. At best, you sound like the pot.
comment in response to
post
But y’all keep accepting these firings as “done deals”. Keep fiddling, I guess.