workingman1918.bsky.social
I hate Liberals and Neoliberals of all nations. Every concession to the right, is a cost on all workers.
Oz Labor and Uk Labour are consistent traitors to the working class.
95 posts
102 followers
49 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
Even the father of Capitalism himself thought of Landlords as parasites.
comment in response to
post
You should look up Gabriel T Rubin, he wrote an article once that suggested people skip breakfast to save money.
A year passed after he wrote that article, and he got laid off from the WSJ.
Our reporters here will face the same, when AI takes their jobs they will beg for our mercy.
comment in response to
post
Mind you, Absolute power to businesses, shareholders, and portfolio holders. Never forget that fact.
When absolute power is held by the Working people however, when the working people exercise dictatorship over the former wealthy, and former businessmen, it is the penultimate form of Justice.
comment in response to
post
Aussie Labor isn’t left also.
Unfortunate is how people tend to forget Oz Labor’s participation in the White Australia policy.
And how they were so quick to send people to die in Europe for WW1, despite not needing to, Economically nor Militarily.
comment in response to
post
Crazy how Lenin literally got this almost 110+ years ago.
comment in response to
post
Would it be accurate to say that Radical Liberalism is infantile Fascism, and Fascism is geriatric liberalism
comment in response to
post
Bandt can always take a leadership position outside of the Seat.
Like as a General Secretary and assign a group leader for parliament. In this setup he wouldn’t have to be bogged down by Spud and Albo and he would do far better outreach than restricting himself to just the CBD area
comment in response to
post
We really need to stop giving Liberals any merits.
They will read this and delude themselves into moving forward with any of the 2 conservative parties.
comment in response to
post
Always be aware of Fascist parties posing as workers parties.
If a party sides with business owners and managers, they are not a workers party
If a party spends all of it’s time segregating workers on the basis of race, religion, and/or gender orientation, they are not a workers party.
comment in response to
post
Unbelievable how this post is flagged by bluesky moderation.
comment in response to
post
Indeed so, and the fact that Elon did the Nazi Salute on stage, and they were covering for him, saying he was “Just waving” is enough evidence to prove that they’re not an Anti-antisemitism group.
They are as equally Fascist and Genocidal as the organisations they claim to detest
comment in response to
post
Let it be known however, that the Liberal party may try to form into a Fascist party.
Always watch out for parties that claim to be “of the people”, and more specifically “of the Australian working people”
They will try to make rich men look like working men.
comment in response to
post
If balancing the economy means a bunch of middlemen companies tacking on exchange prices, on top of costs of extraction and use, then thats not an economy we should support.
Nationalisation of Australia’s resources is the only option left.
comment in response to
post
They have to act like idiots, if they were upfront about it, they would’ve been put into a guillotine, or infront of a firing squad.
They need to keep them rich so the ministers have a permanent source of income. To become rich themselves.
comment in response to
post
And now their fascist union is harassing both Federal and State Labor governments.
comment in response to
post
I’ve read somewhere that when a ceo starts talking like this, it means they’re undergoing divorce.
And considering Facebook was originally used for rating girls at his university, I think it might become a possibility.
comment in response to
post
If Jon is a progressive for being a democrat supporter, then Ernst Rohm is a progressive for being a gay Nazi
comment in response to
post
Unfathomably hilarious how Xiaohongshu (Redbook) has become the most downloaded app on the App Store as the tiktok ban is coming to effect
comment in response to
post
There is a reason why these systems are being privatised and left unmaintained.
It is precisely because it gets in the way of profits. If the system encourages me to compete and survive against others I would need every advantage I can to do that. Because if im not making money theyre making money
comment in response to
post
A state is not a final solution to ethnic discrimination.
It would’ve been easier to rid their home nations of a couple thousand genuine antisemites than displacing millions of Palestinians.
The difference is that one requires solidarity, the other requires belief of ethnic supremacy.
comment in response to
post
Exxonmobil knew the social cost global warming would toll. But they still went ahead and polluted the world anyway.
Those externalities don’t matter, if the government allows you to do it.
comment in response to
post
No company is foolish enough to never consider negative externalities.
They use that to measure how much they can get away with before people start boycotting them.
Positive externalities, will only remain as such, if the company involved does not make it into a subscription or product.
comment in response to
post
It definitely is.
That’s dirt-cheap clean drinking water, that one can sell for profit.
For every 250ml bottle of water that I do not sell, thats a $1.50 I’m not making.
It would be foolish for a capitalist to let that opportunity for profit to pass by.
comment in response to
post
Already happening here in Australia. Slowly I’m seeing the replacement of mom and pop shops with franchises. Market stalls are being replaced by Mega grocery stores, and even specialty shops are being swallowed whole by department stores.
Nobody has ever been more consistently correct than Lenin.
comment in response to
post
At times I fear for the progressive and Anti-Zionist Jewish workers and activists.
Because of the unfortunate intersection they find themselves in, they are prime targets of right wingers and neo-nazis.
And I hope that they always have the personal and peer support they need.
comment in response to
post
Real socialists only wear barrels and suspenders.
comment in response to
post
Thats the point. When you can’t pay, you can’t prove that they did a crime to you, you go to jail for shit you didn’t do and have to work as a legal slave.
It’s all about getting dirt-cheap Labour for making products sold at a hundred times the price they pay you to make it in prison.
comment in response to
post
May I suggest you follow Michael West?
He’s an independent journalist
comment in response to
post
And this extends further to the Zionist “Left” of Israel.
In no way shape or form should there ever be a left that discriminates on the basis of Ethnicity, Race, nor gender identity.
Nor should there be a Left that is concerned with the Ethnic character of their party.
comment in response to
post
Labour should have died a long time ago, the day they hoddled up with Royals and Nobles to stab the working class in the back.
A workers party that mediates between exploiting boss and exploited worker, is no Worker’s party at all.
comment in response to
post
They did not deserve the Genocide that was brought on them.
But you must understand that Fascism needs irrelevant enemies to kill.
“The Jew is a marxist, and a billionaire.”
They need to do that so the German people don’t notice the German Billionaires and side with the German Communists.
comment in response to
post
Interesting that the good-faith mistake, that cost billions of dollars and thousands of lives had almost no checks to it.
comment in response to
post
Or maybe it was Reagan
comment in response to
post
It’s like that one Michael Parenti talk about Liberals talking about how stupid George Bush is, while he’s actively screwing them over.
comment in response to
post
This and the Democrat conspiracy theory of “Elon musk being Trump’s handler for Putin”
Even though it’s more likely class solidarity rather than the other.
comment in response to
post
Put it another way.
It is the ultimate form of class solidarity for the wealthy.
It is how they secure their “right” to own factories and properties that they have never stepped foot or worked in.
comment in response to
post
A fascist dictatorship is the ultimate form of Class solidarity of the wealthy.
It is when they put their differences aside and work together to keep the ownership of their portfolios of properties and factories.
Allianz, Siemens, and Porsche exist today because of their solidarity with Hitler.
comment in response to
post
Fascism favours the wealthy because it is the only tool left that helps the wealthy survive.
The liberal nobility of france would have been guillotined had Bonaparte not hijacked the French Revolution.
Nor would the German Aristocracy was it not for Hitler, and his violence against communists.
comment in response to
post
His aim is to divide the working class.
A working class that is fighting for crumbs and words of affirmation will never ever enact political, physical, and legal violence against those who actively profit and become wealthy from the Labour that they do.
comment in response to
post
They probably should’ve put the Republic of Ireland in there.
But also this doesn’t really guarantee whether the government will act on individuals or corporate entities should they be caught legally Laundering money abroad. An addition to the criminal code along with this, would make it better.
comment in response to
post
Until that revolving door policy that every money-hungry jackrabbit senator, and MP is benefiting from, is completely abolished.
Such a policy will never go through, they’ll drag their feet and blame irrelevant and inconsequential enemies for their failures.
comment in response to
post
As proven time and time again, there is no such thing as a national ideology nor a national interest.
It has always been the financial interests of a couple of rich, and the handful who think they will be rich.
The only ideology that has, and will ever exist, is that of the poor, and of the rich.
comment in response to
post
Same with Ahmed fouad Alkhatib, and John Aziz. When it comes to Palestine.
Every interaction they have with Israelis and Zionists are just gut-wrenchingly pathetic.
comment in response to
post
The Liberals really have gone the radical, conspiracy-theorist route have they?
I guess this somewhat proves Mao’s “Combat Liberalism”
comment in response to
post
My apologies, I meant the system as a whole.
For Telehealth, as long as the worker on the other end has decent working conditions they should be fine.
comment in response to
post
Material Resources-wise? It’s the Communists.
Imaginary-value wise? It’s Democratic Socialism, and Socialism with Chinese characteristics.
It’s important to say that all three push for the same, it’s just that Communists rather give the real materials rather than paper dollars.
comment in response to
post
There’s still long hours, and the stress load you need to deal with.
Just because you have pyjamas on doesn’t mean you can’t get stressed or stop working intensively.
You need to be able to coordinate and distribute work load in the clinics. Because it is a life-critical field
comment in response to
post
Realistically there has only been the ideology of the rich, and the ideology of the poor.
Communism for the poor.(Marxism Leninism Maoism)
And Liberalism for the Rich (Conservatism, Libertarianism, Democratic Socialism, Populist Nationalism, Socialism with Chinese Characteristics)
comment in response to
post
It can always be improved. It may be good for the end-user but it isn’t good for the workers of the medical field.
The money is enticing but that is overshadowed by the terrible working conditions.
comment in response to
post
Same reason as to why it is completely legal for businesses to exploit their workers.
It is solely to overpopulate the media and the parliament with the representatives of the wealthy and the propertied.
The workers cannot have their own interests because it will clash with business interests.