yetanotherhuman.bsky.social
131 posts
37 followers
81 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Dick
comment in response to
post
FYI the 21st century has seen almost infinitely higher call volumes than any other era. Fossil records suggest that Neolithic call volumes were satisfied within contemporaneous QOS commitments.
comment in response to
post
But kEiR sTaRmeR is BoRinG.
comment in response to
post
Interesting that those pisstaking tweets all say "cryptolologic" when in fact he clearly said "cryptologogic".
Makes you wonder who is more stupid.
comment in response to
post
Imagine the state Thames Water would be in with incompetent management!
comment in response to
post
A worse enoch than badenoch?
comment in response to
post
A worse enoch than badenoch!
comment in response to
post
10% on cars and 0% steel is not a "trade deal".
It is an arbitrary and temporary indulgence from an erratic and moronic thug.
comment in response to
post
Extreme narcissists don't really think like that.
What they think right now is far more real and important than the abstract concept of ... objective facts. It wouldn't occur to him that there is an entity/concept/force (i.e. the truth) that might be at odds with his thoughts.
comment in response to
post
There's a scene in Mars Attacks where the president (Jack Nicholson) celebrates making a deal with the martians. Then they all laugh and kill everybody anyway.
comment in response to
post
🤣
comment in response to
post
For the love of God, will people stop using phrases like "... and Trump knows it."
No he doesn't.
He really does not know what a tariff is. He really is that stupid.
He does not and possibly cannot read.
He is a fucking moron. Look at him.
comment in response to
post
Hands up who has read the report...?
comment in response to
post
Looks like blockbuster tapes are going to be unaffordable coz not only are they made in china, but, oh I don't have the
comment in response to
post
My dad mentions Corbyn every time he talks about why he would never vote Labour, despite acknowledging the dishonesty and corruption of Conservatives. He is the the prime Farage target.
Corbyn has had a lasting effect. (Some still go on as if he's some kind of messiah.)
comment in response to
post
See: He has the letters 'C', 'U', 'N', 'T' tatooed on his fingers.
comment in response to
post
Look closely. I just discovered a tattoo on The Convicted Felon's forehead. By examining very carefully I have no doubts, It really says MS-13!
Chocking news.
comment in response to
post
and they always omit "some".
comment in response to
post
Powerful.
comment in response to
post
Who invited him?
comment in response to
post
Criminal, narcissistic grandstanding arseholes will do that.
Nate White summed Trump up perfectly…
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
"Vote for Ken and I"
... "Vote for I"
Sure sign of somebody who doesn't give a shit what words come out of their face. No apologies to other people who are too stupid to know the difference. Yes, it's an important indicator.
comment in response to
post
whitespace
comment in response to
post
Next exemption will be red caps.
Then covfefe.
comment in response to
post
Bull market for Covfefe.
comment in response to
post
I'd agree if I thought for a second that he understood what the term "US treasury bonds" were, or that he somehow bypassed his narcissism to acknowledge that any of it was the result of his poor judgment.
comment in response to
post
"our" greatest ally.
comment in response to
post
No. They have not "choosen"...
Their stupid equation of 1-(import/export ratio) limited to >10% gave us our 10%.
Don't give the fuckers credit for thinking about stuff.
comment in response to
post
Spare a thought for my ex.
We had our differences, but she didn't deserve having an international flurry of written excrement named after her.
comment in response to
post
I'm never sure whether a HUGE grain of salt is more or less insignificant than a ... well, a pinch of salt.
comment in response to
post
So that's 1 minus the country's Import:Export ratio with US.
(Limited to 10%)
It's a number between 10% and 100% that gets bigger if US buys from a country large multiples of what it sells to them. And v-v. But doesn't sound terribly rigorous in terms of tariff reciprcity.
comment in response to
post
Can we rule out an unusually long 2nd term?
comment in response to
post
For this to be relevant there would have to be a 2028 US election.
comment in response to
post
Mr Goodall naively assuming there will be a Supreme Court in 2028?