Profile avatar
zenpec.bsky.social
78 posts 10 followers 13 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
mRNA technology is literally genetic engineering.
comment in response to post
So if one side called the other "people are allowed to treat you like a weirdo for insisting on an archaic and confusing personal definition" for using a definition they didn't like, would you say they are acting in a productive and intellectually honest manner?
comment in response to post
Are intellectually honest participants in a debate supposed to consider each other's definitions? Or shit on the other's definition?
comment in response to post
Is that something I said?
comment in response to post
No. Everyone was a threat, including "vaccinated" people.
comment in response to post
That wasn't a premise, that was the claim. If you agree with my claim that's it: you are agreeing with me.
comment in response to post
Name one thing I said that is wrong. You don't even know what I've said.
comment in response to post
So in other words "use language in exactly the way I want or you are a [insert obscene insult]". Very "cooperative" of you.
comment in response to post
You can't even ask the question correctly because there are at least *two* aspects of effectiveness that were highly debated. And only one of those matters for my claim, which you clearly haven't read yet.
comment in response to post
You know you are the one engaging in ad hominem right there, right?
comment in response to post
There's no argument. You are literally implying that I'm something purely because I appear to be that something. That can't be anything other than a fallacy.
comment in response to post
Why don't you go back and actually read what I actually claimed before *you* started to object to the term "vaccines"?
comment in response to post
You are not the arbiter of what matters. I decide what matters to me.
comment in response to post
Yes, *organically*. You cannot force people to use the definition that you fancy.
comment in response to post
I don't need to refute this argument because I'm not the straw man that you are hallucinating in your head.
comment in response to post
If you want to call apples "oranges", go ahead. I'm going to stick with the established definitions that have useful meaning. Thanks.
comment in response to post
Quotes are used precisely for this purpose. COVID-19 mRNA shots are "vaccines" in exactly the same way as koalas are "bears".
comment in response to post
So if it glitters it must be gold. Solid logic.
comment in response to post
No. Facts are not arguments. COVID-19 mRNA shots don't contain a causative agent. Period.
comment in response to post
What does that have to do with me referring to them as "vaccines"?
comment in response to post
Who cares? @fenny.moe I called them "COVID-19 shots" and he didn't like that. That's the whole point of this thread. He doesn't like me using quotes and referring to them as "vaccines".
comment in response to post
"counts as a vaccine" and "is a vaccine" are two very different statements.
comment in response to post
Sure. But they are not vaccines.
comment in response to post
OK. So you don't know what a vaccine is. Just like you didn't know what mRNA technology is.
comment in response to post
Exactly. So they are *nothing* like the vaccines that have been tested for decades. They are a completely new technology that doesn't do what vaccines have done.
comment in response to post
They are.
comment in response to post
You just spelled it out. mRNA technology avoids the production of vaccines.
comment in response to post
Why would I cite sources saying there's no formation of antibodies?
comment in response to post
It is easy.
comment in response to post
I'm not pretending anything. Do COVID-19 mRNA shots have the causative agent? It's a simple yes-or-no question.
comment in response to post
In the context of COVID-19, the causative agent is the agent that causes the disease, in this case the SARS-CoV-2 virus. How is that difficult to understand?
comment in response to post
If you need sources that explain the most quintessential feature of mRNA technology, that means you have *no idea* what mRNA even is.
comment in response to post
LOL. I'll take that as "I didn't know". That explains a lot.
comment in response to post
You know that COVID-19 mRNA shots don't contain any causative agent, right?
comment in response to post
Good thing you are the "tolerant" one. Also, in case you didn't know "vaccinated" people also transmit the disease.
comment in response to post
So you don't believe in "my body my choice"?
comment in response to post
If reality hurts you so much, then click the block button, that's what it's for.
comment in response to post
You know there are studies in which participants present spike protein after 700 days, right? Post-vaccination syndrome is now a recognized disease. These are facts.
comment in response to post
What part of "COVID-19 shots are genetic engineering" is a "conspiracy theory"?
comment in response to post
That wasn't a promise.
comment in response to post
It's not a war.
comment in response to post
Really? Then why wasn't he found guilty of incitement?
comment in response to post
That's not a command. It's an idiom. And plenty of Democrats have used the same rhetoric hundreds of times.
comment in response to post
What is depicted in the photo.
comment in response to post
Except with no people.
comment in response to post
Trump didn't do it.