'Federal lands are a national resource, and the nation needs more housing'
so divide up this common resource for private profit - rather than re-building communities so they aren't sprawling hellholes?
good grief this piece is so so so moronic and shortsighted.
so divide up this common resource for private profit - rather than re-building communities so they aren't sprawling hellholes?
good grief this piece is so so so moronic and shortsighted.
Reposted from
Wyatt Myskow
Love that this column pretends Las Vegas is some model for how to do this well (it’s really not) and that the current federal government would do anything to fix the fundamentals problems with building housing on public lands (sprawl and unaffordable homes).
www.nytimes.com/2025/04/15/o...
www.nytimes.com/2025/04/15/o...
Comments
There are pockets here of great bike infrastructure-so much potential to NOT sprawl out, if going ‘up’ were considered.
It makes no sense
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Nw6qyyrTeI
instead of densifying - appelbaum proposes putting apartments on arid, infrastructure-less land near an airport
noise pollution. air pollution. unwalkable...
with homes for 13,000 residents, space for 20,000 jobs, hotels, cafes, restaurants, abundant open space and affordable housing.
the problem isn't the lack of land. it's visionless leadership
US planners and city government are fundamentally incapable of delivering the car-light people-centric places that are popping up all over asia and the EU
like blautal on a former mall in ulm.
1000 homes and open space on just 16 acres.
https://www.baunetz.de/meldungen/Meldungen-ASTOC_mit_bauchplan_._gewinnen_in_Ulm_8475168.html