This is the op-ed Rumeysa Ozturk co-wrote in 2024 criticizing the Tufts administration’s response to student demands for action regarding Gaza and Israel. It is unquestionably speech protected by the First Amendment.
/1
https://www.tuftsdaily.com/article/2024/03/4ftk27sm6jkj
/1
https://www.tuftsdaily.com/article/2024/03/4ftk27sm6jkj
Comments
I cannot imagine what horrors would await them if they were deported back to Israel.
Only fascists cheer this.
This leads me to questions.
Trump himself supports Bibi personally and Israel as long as he thinks they are pro-Trump.
Others in the admin support Israel as an example of ethnic groups having their own countries.
The Op-Ed isn’t some personal rant about the war in Gaza.
This org’s actions stand against everything the overwhelming majority of Jews believe in. It does serve the Kremlin’s interests very well.
What’s deeply antisemitic is the use of the term “Sicherheitsdienst.”
Calling Jews Nazis is the epitome of antisemitism.
This should frighten everyone.
nothing to see here...
In which trump and Witkoff set the stage for abandoning Israel. Ken’s not wrong about that.
https://www.thenation.com/article/world/canary-mission-israel-covert-operations/
Not today tho
It may be that you are more optimistic than I that there is still enough left to initiate a recovery.
Anyway, how many times do we need a lawyer to explain what acts are a violation of a law that is no longer enforceable, in this case a law enshrined in the constitution?
I mean, the case is worth a mention and all but..
Waiting for the free speech absolutists to stand up
THIS gets you summarily renditioned? It’s NOTHING! How did it even rise to anyone’s attention?
And even if it were, the First Amendment protects speech that isn’t popular…
U.S. Code: Material Support to Terrorist Organizations
Under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(B). Is he right?