We don’t talk enough about how stupid and nonsensical the “sites inventory” is as a part of the Housing Element process.
What an expensive, wasteful paper exercise. Just made up numbers for sites which may or may not be realistic for redevelopment and state regulators have no real way to find out.
What an expensive, wasteful paper exercise. Just made up numbers for sites which may or may not be realistic for redevelopment and state regulators have no real way to find out.
Comments
Everything else is fake math and a creative writing exercise that costs cities and states $100,000+ per document.
History of units as % of zoned capacity
Simple math, objective evaluation
Is that because cities are not going to fund the affordable housing component except by modest IZ, we should be requiring a massive amount of market rate above the nonimal RHNA. (And giving partial affordable credit for each MR home in excess of nominal RHNA)
HCD: I'll allow it
HCD: sure!