I got comments exactly like this a long time ago when I made a video comparing biking to driving over the same distance. A certain kind of person will simply say the first nonsensical thing that pops into their head just so they can feel like a clever contrarian
Reposted from
Alessandro Rigolon
A dude on Facebook is trying to explain to me that driving a fuel efficient car is more environmentally friendly than biking because *wait for it* biking requires eating more and the environmental impacts of those calories outweigh the impact of producing, transporting and fueling a car. Amazing
Comments
in the USA. Here in Holland all 17 million bikers only eat organic food from their own gardens.
A pro cyclist can average 300 watts and can cover about 30 miles in an hour. You probably don't have a watt meter, but probably average 100 watts and cover 10 miles. Either way: 10wh/mi.
https://youtu.be/-7UcvadTgac?si=656GAU6FBNTPQy_O
https://www.faz.net/aktuell/technik-motor/fahrrad-und-co2-bilanz-13-kilogramm-tomaten-fuer-2500-kilokalorien-18468552.html
Cars use so much energy. Cyclists use so little
We can reasonably eat all the things we want and make our emissions budgets if we cut back the first two.
https://usa.streetsblog.org/2013/03/04/washington-state-lawmaker-cyclists-cause-pollution-by-exhaling