Profile avatar
andyinafield.bsky.social
?
3,622 posts 237 followers 512 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
The article states that output is limited to 800W (assume per household). So tailored-ish to domestic consumption. Quite a nice approach that doesn't result in unmanageable dumping on to grid.
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
"England."
comment in response to post
"Democracy in danger." Erm, no lads. That ship has sailed.
comment in response to post
I assume he broke the dress code.
comment in response to post
That seemed to be what he was suggesting. So much winning.
comment in response to post
40 tops.
comment in response to post
Bendigedig
comment in response to post
How so?
comment in response to post
That seems to be it until she stops for elevenses. Which is strong sweat tea. Then she ran into the lunch issue. It was all quite mad. Cos she's a liar.
comment in response to post
Pretty much my view. All parties, but especially the actual government, need to get a grip on the sodding media, though. It continues to aggressively promote foreign backed, disruptive christofascists. It's ridiculous.
comment in response to post
Lack of confidence is definitely a thing. It might say Barry on my birth certificate, but I was made in Sheffield. Came back 15 years ago still can't get my head around the lack. Welsh labour really have been poor.
comment in response to post
Of course, you blanked Cymru. As above, so below.
comment in response to post
Less pricking around simply an impossibility under the previous management. Current lot significantly less bellendy, but for some reason have shackled themselves to the last lot's self harming red lines. ALMO bellendery.
comment in response to post
Scotland. Scamp.
comment in response to post
"....less pricking around in London." Hmm.
comment in response to post
The corrupt venal oaf Johnson got to puss off the French, though. Globule Britain prospering mightily and all that jazz.
comment in response to post
Probably as good as could be expected given their nonsensical red lines. Wales shafted again.
comment in response to post
Eek
comment in response to post
Not really sure what this could look like. I imagine if the libdems really turned up the heat that would pull in the nats. This may give the pro-EU labour mps and members a boost. Gtto just ain't enough. No idea what normals are left in the cons. They'll have to move somewhere i suppose.
comment in response to post
Have you done the breakfast bit yet?
comment in response to post
The whole thing was just weird.
comment in response to post
Grindset is a word I don't know. Slightly nervous about looking it up.
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
6. Cats.
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
Difficult to say. No detail other than "I WORK REALLY HARD" stated repeatedly.
comment in response to post
Reeves unable to answer the substantive point. And she knew it. This is bad.
comment in response to post
Not really covered, I'm afraid. Quite a bit of chat about McDonald's, though. Some plausible.
comment in response to post
Your lazy theory is obviously wrong. Up at 5, begins scrolling to see all the terrible things that are happening. Carries on "working" till midnight. I kid you not. No consistency, no sense. Very, very odd. "My politics isn't about attacking other people. "
comment in response to post
The Forde interview is, um, revealing
comment in response to post
Ah, the 27th Fundamental Constant.
comment in response to post
Someone on here said she's not done a constituency surgery for four years. No idea if that's true or not, but it would explain a few things.
comment in response to post
By all accounts, Boothroyd was universally well liked. She kept much bigger beasts than these monkeys in line, though.
comment in response to post
Ah, the Chorley chocolate teapot. Stealing a living.
comment in response to post
But twitter reckons.....
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
He'll yeah!