danielrice.bsky.social
Law prof @ UNC-Chapel Hill (incoming). Con Law and Indian Law.
Bio: https://law.unc.edu/people/daniel-rice/
SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1684746
106 posts
3,036 followers
703 following
Prolific Poster
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
The touchstone should be badness (however defined), rather than ancient badness. History shows that some legislative "experiments" were reprehensible and needed to be stifled! chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcont...) (/end)
comment in response to
post
Barrett is leveraging the fact that evolving understandings of equality came to be implemented rather formalistically (through the tiers of scrutiny). But it's arbitrary to require a lengthy record of horrendous behavior before applying heightened scrutiny. (3/)
comment in response to
post
Once again, something like history-and-tradition is concealing a judicial value judgment.
Barrett is also learning the wrong lessons about how modern EP doctrine developed. Those advances were wholly nontraditionalist; their authors found ways around the constraining force of the past. (2/)
comment in response to
post
where’s the ‘’envy’’ button?
comment in response to
post
When I started teaching Indian Law, I was confused (and repelled) by the Court’s nonchalance toward some of our nation’s worst moral crimes. This piece highlights the Court’s continued apathy and tries to imagine a better system. Thoughts/critiques are extremely welcome!
comment in response to
post
Stop plagiarizing my life!
comment in response to
post
Attending!
comment in response to
post
Tornado hit a few miles from my house (and knocked out power) as we were getting ready to move. Tornadoes are bad.
comment in response to
post
so much bondage.
comment in response to
post
Although, hundreds of cats will attack you if you tweet.
comment in response to
post
Please livetweet!
comment in response to
post
fair
comment in response to
post
John Harrison? chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol68...
comment in response to
post
Just contributing to the ratio on this one.
comment in response to
post
Drats, the day after I move!
comment in response to
post
"aren't necessarily" is putting it kindly :P
comment in response to
post
Sadly, it was not one of my college-era books that survived six moves.
comment in response to
post
Also conscripted to perform road duty in the late 19th century!
comment in response to
post
Id.
comment in response to
post
But for law students, having an "AI assistant" summarize cases for you is (to borrow someone else's analogy) like having a robot lift weights for you at the gym.