elgobsucram.bsky.social
Probably playing devil's advocate. Probably eating. Probably playing some RPG. Scientist and regulatory specialist.
3,389 posts
699 followers
237 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
See now you get it
comment in response to
post
Godddd that takes me back, instrument shutdowns SUUUUUUCK
comment in response to
post
I don't understand
comment in response to
post
Die
comment in response to
post
Yeah, she'll appear at my desk to yell, set her flying monkeys at me and take my boss to court for not enforcing non-existent toilet policing laws with a bouncer/genitals inspector
comment in response to
post
***DISCLAIMER*** no "biologically female" fire marshal was available, I sincerely apologise for my invasive, predatory actions. I'm such a misogynist.
comment in response to
post
Losers
comment in response to
post
He hasn't, but I'm not sure what that has to do with people sitting at the bottom of my street at least 7 hours before a venue opens?
comment in response to
post
Almost home. I didn't do anything bad after that...
...besides use Too Good To Go to pick up donuts...
comment in response to
post
Note: do not take them before 8am 😂 At least I'm finally back on them though, only had 3 sets over the last year and a half.
comment in response to
post
I have decided I will have to keep visiting my "friend" and play it on his. Switch 2 in more than one way.
comment in response to
post
Why would they think? They have AI to do it for them. Can't see *any* issues there.
comment in response to
post
I finally started playing the DLC 3 weeks ago, I feel like I'm missing out not having the switch 2 yet ðŸ˜
comment in response to
post
Capitalism took protest and made it ineffectual by destroying the point of it, making it unattractive, and making the masses enemies of each other.
You're hysterical/ You're a criminal/ You're fired/ You cost taxpayer money/ You're no friend. (delete as applicable)
comment in response to
post
ðŸ˜They don't understand how truly mad they are
comment in response to
post
I'd probably be worried if we were still using pre-1950s nuclear technology. But we aren't
comment in response to
post
Ad verbum she said "from beautiful mother nature" which, fine, build a site 4x as large as nuclear in the same site and say it's what she wanted
comment in response to
post
Wherever there's a deviance from white man capitalistic ideals there a fuck-tonne of braindead morons.
Tbf this woman was all for green energy but she kept mentioning "everyone" wanting it as if NIMBYs don't exist, of which she kinda is
comment in response to
post
But us allies are the ones suffering a "social contagion" and "mind virus"
300 hit pieces a month?! That's what, roughly 1 article per month for every 1000 trans people. Is it even possible to statistically name a more demonised demographic of the country?! Who aren't even represented in government
comment in response to
post
Is she still harping on about burqas when her entire constituency is a shithole with one of the highest child poverty rates?
comment in response to
post
The anti-trans lobby got an entire clinic closed down for their hysteria, but a teacher can't be fired for sharing her unprofessional views. If gay teachers aren't allowed to mention their lives and opinions, why does she get no punishment.
comment in response to
post
Because the -ists and -phobes genuinely believe they already have, and believe giving to someone means taking from they and their "hard-fought" life.
comment in response to
post
We didn't get your email, it didn't find us well, because it wasn't invented at the time of your named malady
comment in response to
post
Presumably then, if she's refusing to speak to women in niqabs and burqas because they're "intimidating" (on demand, because it wasn't a thing before), she'll also insist that members of the Christian clergy don't wear their garb outside of church because it'll disturb victims of their child abuse.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
It's always the anons
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Honestly the govt should hammer home the notion that everyone crying for these payments to go to all pensioners are the same people who want to cut benefits for the poor, and they earn FAR less than the £36,000 threshold for this fucking payment. These thresholds should be held up side by side.
comment in response to
post
And my biggest ick with the whole thing - they have the audacity to whinge about foreigners and the unemployed being given benefits because they see it as being taken from them. But if they kept/keep taking how did they expect the young, poor and foreogn to achieve anything?
comment in response to
post
Even if we were entitled brats, they created the world that requires us to buy the things they made mandatory to live. They miss-sold "trickle down economics" as a sustainable/viable system of governance as they lined their pockets, blindly assuming their progeny could do the same.
comment in response to
post
To be fair you would. Probably kept her a modicum of relevance, being admitted to cultural fame as a meme
comment in response to
post
Then they show us stories of young people who have bought homes from "hard work". But they, without exception, show these young folk lived at home for an extra decade or more, had their lives subsidised and help with deposits. Most didn't pay rent to their parents either. So disingenuous 2/2
comment in response to
post
We ARE pissed. But when we point out we can't afford to live the easy life they were almost literally handed before they hoarded and crashed the economy multiple times, they get condescending and tell us to cancel Netflix 1/2
comment in response to
post
Pensioners: people shouldn't get so much free money
Government: *stops their free money*
Pensioners: N-No, not THAT free money.
comment in response to
post
THE AGENDA DOESN'T STOP AT ARE KIDZ