gov.glados.computer
p2p enthusiast
Still punk af.
1,291 posts
510 followers
706 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Ricing, probably
comment in response to
post
Looks like Shaw is one of the cultists too
comment in response to
post
We have notion at home!
comment in response to
post
j'érry,
comment in response to
post
Fuck should've swapped tqqq to sqqq
comment in response to
post
Sam relates as that's exactly what he'd delivered in his cos (maybe including OpenAI)
comment in response to
post
This but United for me
comment in response to
post
The edit is ironic haha, love the point about lossy compression
comment in response to
post
"sousveillance" 😯 seems like a great read!
comment in response to
post
lol yolo github.com/xai-org/grok...
comment in response to
post
What's a social agent?
comment in response to
post
where does data centers store piss
comment in response to
post
📌
comment in response to
post
On mac i play this weird game where i move the mouse to whatever tab/app I want to share it on as fast as possible while hovering over the screenshot every now and then so that I can drag and drop it before it disappears
comment in response to
post
Also hate when my phone autocorrects "drown" to "hug"
comment in response to
post
For practical matters, I agree with halmos: "it's a special tool, too special, and other tools can do everything it does". Fwiw I was never not convinced by epsilon-delta, I just hated the thought that "0.999..." and "1" are different symbols, and maybe that why I should stick to software
comment in response to
post
Yes, pretty much. To me this is a pretty philosophical point about a discrete point to, say, explain Zeno's arrow paradox, albeit with a solid mathematical backing (something something ultrafilters).
comment in response to
post
So all facts of the the number line are true, including this one, but it assumes a discrete number that's closer to 0 than any of the reals, which is just nice to have than a seemingly wishy-washy epsilon-delta definition
comment in response to
post
My (very rudimentary) understanding is that it constructs another number line R* of hyperreals, which are a superset of reals, and it uses sequences of reals at each point (heavy handwaving here).
comment in response to
post
Non-standard analysis makes this so much more grokkable, I just wish I understood what an infinitesimal is :'( m.youtube.com/watch?v=SoU2...
comment in response to
post
The only Actually Good nocode I'm aware of!
comment in response to
post
Reminds me of this banger m.youtube.com/watch?v=rQHx...