jamesdolson.bsky.social
511 posts
92 followers
188 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
Shooter using police vehicle with emergency lights on at Hortman’s house. Either an extraordinary amount of preparation by a civilian or shooter was either current or ex law enforcement.
comment in response to
post
Information about the assumed shooter was he was spotted at Hortman’s house with police vehicle in the driveway with emergency lights on, seems a lot more likely it’s an actual law enforcement officer given the police car.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
This is what you get when you train an LLM on Reddit. Garbage in, garbage out.
comment in response to
post
It will be appealed and SCOTUS has 6 votes for the position that GOP presidents are dictators and everyone knows it.
comment in response to
post
The very idea it's an actual strategy instead of whatever idea burbles up from the muck of Trump's brain that day is absurd.
comment in response to
post
NO. IT'S NOT SHOULD, IT'S HAS TO OR NO REGULAR ORDER FROM DEMS IN THE SENATE. IF YOU LET THIS SLIDE, YOU'RE ALL GOING TO WIND UP IN JAIL ON BS CHARGES.
comment in response to
post
You have to get rid of Schumer 1st. To paraphrase Cromwell: “You have been sitting there too long for any good you have been doing. In the name of God go!”
comment in response to
post
He wants a massacre and he thinks the visuals of marines shooting a Latinos and anyone waving a Mexican flag would be good for him. He’s not wrong that Fox would run that 24x7 for the rest of 2025.
comment in response to
post
Well played.
comment in response to
post
1932. Douglas MacArthur led US troops against WWI veterans in Washington DC during the great depression.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
I despise Newsome's transparent opportunism but he's one of the very few high profile Democratic pols willing to put themselves in front of a TV camera right now and call bullshit so not the ideal time to take pot shots at him. Praise him for what he's doing to get more Dem politicians to do it.
comment in response to
post
I have a great deal of disdain for Newsome but at least he’s doing the right thing, he’s getting in front of TV cameras and calling bullshit, something that Jeffries and Schumer are utterly incapable of doing. Under the circumstances we have to take what we can get.
comment in response to
post
The WH pool knows less about legal authority than my 12 year old and cares even less. Who needs laws when you have vibes is their moto.
comment in response to
post
He’s thinking post Congress lobbying career in Silicon Valley
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
True enough but are there enough competent lawyers left in DOJ to do the job?
comment in response to
post
Don't feed the troll attention.
comment in response to
post
LOL, CNN is so unbelievably pathetic.
comment in response to
post
You're both fundamentally missing the point. Trump doesn't need spaceX, he doesn't care what is good for US Space program.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
By Monday, they will be fondly remembering when it was $225.
comment in response to
post
the foreshadowing was really well done by the writers
comment in response to
post
Let's just say that Pride is especially bitchy this year.....
comment in response to
post
It's going to drop like a stone tomorrow at open, Musk just called for impeaching Trump after the market closed.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
I can't think who else could direct something with these levels of divadom, I really can't.
comment in response to
post
I love the media pretends that people with sub toddler levels of impulse control always have a plan for what they do.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Trump doesn't care about space since it rarely receives significant popular media attention any more. Sure it's a strategic area but he never cares about that, he cares about what appears on Fox News.
comment in response to
post
Bernie Bernbaum shouldn't have tried to go that well twice. Trump's hair looks shockingly like 'Rug' Daniels in the alley after the kid tugs on it.
'They took his hair, Tommy. Jesus that's strange. Why would they do that?'
comment in response to
post
Yikes, little house on the prairie in 2025. Laundry and the dishwasher are what I miss the most when we lose power for more than a few hours.
comment in response to
post
Pfft, he knows John Roberts is a lickspittle. Actually everyone knows Roberts is a Trump lickspittle, there isn’t anything Trump can do that won’t have Roberts asking for more of the same.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
It’s a difference of approach, I despise Musk but SpaceX did the same thing with Falcon which is now very reliable, they iterated fast, had a relatively high rate of failure but learned what failed and quickly developed something all the others thought couldn’t be done with reusable rockets.
comment in response to
post
I have a different take, Kill Bill is both Tarantino’s best and worst film, it’s his best because it’s the best of his 70’s homage films his best non linear structure but it’s his worst because it was what got him stuck in the rut he’s been in ever since with ever decreasing results.
comment in response to
post
The Fifth's circuit official position is that whatever dinosaur like GOP officials censor is valid no matter what the constitution or prior legal precedent is. Pretending there are principles behind their trolling gives them more respect than they deserve.
comment in response to
post
It won't because the court won't actually do anything but you already knew the answer to that.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
True enough but it’s actually shocking they did this because it’s 100% not their regular practice. Is that bad? Seems really bad that an entire political party can lie with impunity knowing that they will never be called on the lies by the leading media outlet.
comment in response to
post
Well it was a Republican and the media rule is that no matter how corrupt or incompetent, GOP scandals can only last 3 days, after that coverage has to be minimizing and printing whatever blatantly fact free defense they come up must be uncritically treated as gospel truth.
comment in response to
post
It’s not a conflict of interest, it’s selling access, which is blatant corruption. But it’s NYT so you have to minimize the political damage for Trump any way possible.
comment in response to
post
Blatant corruption isn't a 'conflict of interest'. It's rather pathetic that a business built on words like the NYT fails to understand that. Internally the NYT has literally lost the meanings of words they are so used to shading everything in the interest of trying to appear non partisan.
comment in response to
post
It's the NYTimes, the standard is that if Trump or a GOP member of Congress does it it's only corruption if an acutal billboard was taken out that says I'm doing a corrupt deal but if a Democrat does it and a panel of Fox News viewers heard somewhere it was suspect, then it's obviously corrupt.
comment in response to
post
@NYTimes will never call anything he does corrupt, not as a mistake or bad editorial decision, it’s policy. NYTimes is pro Trump. It just is, they disguise it and try to normalize what he does but that’s the goal.
comment in response to
post
Because giving Trump a pass on everything isn’t a mistake, it’s policy. Nepo Sulzberger wants his billionaire tax cut like all the rest.
comment in response to
post
If a GOP president then it's fine. That's the rule, everyone knows it and pretending otherwise is willful denial of reality.
comment in response to
post
The SA was notoriously sloppy and irregular in its operations.
comment in response to
post
Not even remotely torn. The more lazy and incompetent he and his lackey Dan are the better. He would add absolutely nothing positive if he were active, his agenda is entirely destructive so the more incompetent he is the better.