jdaniele.bsky.social
Technical Support Engineer | Deep thinker, believes in flawless equality, a fair and trustworthy person. | Keep calm and trust the scientific method.
Official Website: https://jeremydaniele.com
Mastodon: https://techhub.social/@jdaniele
72 posts
118 followers
144 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I wonder why they hate Juneteenth so much... Also, why do they pretend to like America? They act exactly like people who hate freedom and progress. They obsess over power and oppression. To even debate this is insanity.
comment in response to
post
Are they required to say why and provide the information of who is making that call? If no, then why is that even legal? If it sounds very illegal, then it should probably be illegal.
comment in response to
post
Create a two party system then make them hate the other. They'll never vote outside of their party because they're cult minded. They called themselves patriots 🤦♂️ The irony is just boiling over.
comment in response to
post
And you're basing your opinion on what? Your feelings? What is "soon" mean to you? What are you trying to say? You aren't making a point other than making a prediction.
comment in response to
post
How is that not relevant though? You made a comment based on one attribute of a person. I asked about removing that attribute. There's no other way to interpret that.
comment in response to
post
Let me ask a question specifically in opposition to this comment. If you simply didn't know the person talking was a gay person or even didn't know they were a woman. Would you like them any better? If the response changes, then our process must change. That entire way of thinking needs to stop.
comment in response to
post
The simple reason is they make police legally immune. Once they did that, it's never been the same. Cops break the law and never have any crimes filed against them personally. Until that is fixed, it will be like that forever. Sure you'll win in court but the police don't think they're at fault.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
With that footage, I don't see how they wouldn't win a lawsuit against that department.
comment in response to
post
Creating a prophecy isn't a prophecy. It's just indirect murder.
comment in response to
post
The only part that was false information was calling Signal an unsecured app. That should've been corrected immediately and I personally wish Signal sued if they declined to correct the record.
comment in response to
post
Most people who come to Signal either use it to talk to friends already on it, or they specifically chose Signal. Anyone who chooses to use Signal knows what it is. The second you hear, they used a fork. The story wasn't about Signal anymore. Also, this was human error and not an app error.
comment in response to
post
Can you post the source?
comment in response to
post
Here's another one lol he just doesn't think it's a crime.
abcnews.go.com/Politics/tru...
comment in response to
post
They're too liberal in his mind.
comment in response to
post
When are the latest numbers publically reported?
comment in response to
post
He doesn't think bribery should be illegal so he'll pardon them all.
comment in response to
post
As far as I'm concerned, no one checks or confirms anything because they don't directly feel the consequences of it.
comment in response to
post
They're trying so hard. The dumb part is that once something is public, it is there forever, and we can see everything changed whether they like it or not. It makes them look even dumber.
comment in response to
post
The thing is, we have all the records of things before they changed it. They're literally recording in history, that they are trying to erase their racism and mechanisms to help against it. We all see it happening. They will forever be known by trying to erase history. Idiots
comment in response to
post
The fact that being "weak" has such a wide interpretation, is weird in itself.
comment in response to
post
When science proves something that directly contradicts a religious claim, we should be excited. One less thing to live in a mystery. The only thing that supersedes a science fact is a more advanced (detailed) science fact.
comment in response to
post
I just don't understand why there's so much denial. They literally teach you the process, how to understand it, and the results. Science is a self supporting subject. To deny it, is just insanity.
What I find stranger is a comparison of religion to science. They have nothing to do with each other.
comment in response to
post
Hitler is widely taught in public schools. I think it's mostly in high school, but I could be wrong. No one should be shocked by what is happening. It's so stupid obvious, but some are living in denial because he hasn't murdered anyone, as far as we know.
comment in response to
post
The "road to tyranny" quote from Bill Clinton I needed to fact check. It's so true and today is no less.
bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-roo...
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
No not for specifically using a Signal chat. Does your job require that work topics be only spoken on a specific platform and you get caught using it outside if that? Yes, you should be fired or extremely disciplined. Did Peter violate the terms of employment and law? Yes absolutely he did.
comment in response to
post
Must be nice, being so rich, that those things are a joke to you.
comment in response to
post
Science is a series of facts and not view points 🤦♂️
comment in response to
post
Most site the AAA chart just like in this article. See for yourselves.
gasprices.aaa.com
comment in response to
post
News organizations would never be able to post anything if they needed written permission from everyone in a public setting.
comment in response to
post
Idk what you're trying to say. A requirement isn't an opinion. It's either allowed or not. Everyone who goes knows the risks. However, it's also not illegal in anyway to be at a protest. You can't take a photo and personally get permission from every single person. That is just unreasonable.
comment in response to
post
If elected officials aren't required to follow enforced laws, then why even have elected officials? At this point, I think the point is you need someone in places to check the next line of power. Each with its own set of rules on how it enforces.
comment in response to
post
Judges are chosen by the very people who we elect. If elected officials remove people they approved, then what are we saying about our own elected officials?
comment in response to
post
By removing a judges' authority or the judges themselves, means you don't believe in a checks and balance system anymore. At that point why even have judges?