marshru.bsky.social
70 posts
45 followers
20 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Could that also be the reason for this?
open.substack.com/pub/phillips...
comment in response to
post
š„¶
comment in response to
post
And is anyone even slightly surprised?
comment in response to
post
Wait. Doesnāt Columbia have billions in assets? Time to eschew government funding for the time being.
comment in response to
post
Read the chapter on recidivism prediction.
comment in response to
post
Totally meets expectations. This calculation is probably just at the level of his ability to comprehend.
comment in response to
post
I should say please *read* and circulate widely.
comment in response to
post
But never mind, no big deal, it was an innocent mistake, theyāve learned their lesson, no classified information was shared, and anyone who thinks this is common practice by this administration with ample use of ādisappearing messagesā to obscure their activities is a mad conspiracy theorist.
comment in response to
post
Perfect image to depict this group of performative teenagers.
comment in response to
post
Just Hegseth? They were all on this āchatā and nobody checked or said it was inappropriate conversation for an unapproved platform. Plus they all sounded like immature teenagers in a pissing contest, saying what tough talk theyād take back to Daddy if everyone agreed (please donāt agree).
comment in response to
post
In a land famous for its dangerous creatures, Australian kids grow up worrying about magpies.
comment in response to
post
Post a warning
comment in response to
post
Thank goodness! Hoping this applies in Australia as we near an election and our opposition leader sounds more like Trump every day š¤
comment in response to
post
Now that we have the presidents biggest donor running things on his behalf why should the George Soros trope hold any water? Itās all about the money and the oligarchs now.
comment in response to
post
Donāt remind me. Already chilly in Sydney. š§
comment in response to
post
Yea ok - youāre not wrong. Iām not American and wondered if there was some obscure law about impeachment within 100 days (go back to the people for another election for instance) but magical thinking.
comment in response to
post
Iām aware - but is there anything important about impeaching him within 100 days other than the symbolism? Itās been mentioned a few time in this thread.
comment in response to
post
Whatās the importance of the 70 day limit?
comment in response to
post
How predictable was that? We know whatās coming next - a major interruption to (whatās left of) normal service in order to stamp out corruption. Ask for the evidence.
comment in response to
post
Itās called weaponised stupidity.
comment in response to
post
If youāre in a hurry, listen to his 15 minute chat with Dahlia Lithwick on Amicus (great podcast by the way).
slate.com/podcasts/ami...
comment in response to
post
Love it @chrislhayes.bsky.social, and notwithstanding R1ās relative efficiency, how much water and energy did that enquiry just use? Not massive on its own, but multiply by the daily global user base. Would be interesting to know.
comment in response to
post
Shock and awe - theyāre overwhelmed. We also need to keep
showing the hypocrisy to highlight what heās really doing. Heās spending hundreds of millions more on airforce planes for deportations just for the look of it. Heās not interested in saving money so what are the spending cuts really about?
comment in response to
post
Heāll grow into his name in no time, but for the moment Iāll be calling him lil Bart.
comment in response to
post
That is the sweetest thing Iāve ever seen š
comment in response to
post
What a beautiful little pup - you can see sheās going to grow up just lovely.
comment in response to
post
No surprises there
comment in response to
post
Me too ā¤ļø
comment in response to
post
Could not agree more!
comment in response to
post
And what would she call pardoning the son in lawās dad who served time for far worse and then making him ambassador to France? And thatās just one of many. Everyone stop the pearl clutching - no norms were broken here, and Biden is protecting a son being punished for the āsinsā of the father.
comment in response to
post
Iām going to!