Profile avatar
michatronix.bsky.social
Keeping pulse on Atlanta, technology, politics and sports.
623 posts 97 followers 178 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
I just drove 11 hours from Arkansas to Atlanta on Saturday. Forget Wyoming, the whole I-22 corridor is completely barren.
comment in response to post
This is all a planned distraction from the real issue: local DC politics
comment in response to post
“Play dead until the Midterms and the US population will grow weary of the excesses of Trump and vote Dem instead” - Literally their only strategy
comment in response to post
Yes but then he faced deep state pushback and so people thought that would just happen again and they could get their tax cut while having Trump take a hard stance on “gangbangers”
comment in response to post
Still have to pay $2 for inflight snacks. Qatar was going to throw that in with the deal, but the Whitehouse ethics team put a stop to it.
comment in response to post
Surely this will be fixed by cutting taxes and unleashing American ingenuity.
comment in response to post
“He grew up in Garden City Long Island, not far from Manhattan”
comment in response to post
Isn’t being a YIMBY something Dems should moderate on to attract a large coalition? Seems like local push back shows the political strength of the NIMBY coalition which would be silly to push into the arms of Republicans if looking to build a big tent.
comment in response to post
The start was not the beginning. There are neither beginnings nor endings to History. But it was a beginning.
comment in response to post
He has 10 of those too, but they are all suing him for child support.
comment in response to post
This way he can fold Armour Yard development costs into the Clifton corridor project which has way more political capital and clout. Why AY? No idea. Either a development buddy wants it or he wants to make an infill station anywhere just to say he did something.
comment in response to post
Another scalp for @benwikler.bsky.social
comment in response to post
The big towel select a size where two sizes are bigger than a regular sized towel but they perforate the towels differently so you are more likely to tear off two than just one.
comment in response to post
When will Rubio get banned for travel for being complicit in the censoring of foreign students? Talk about glass houses.
comment in response to post
Problem for whom? And why?
comment in response to post
Wanted to avoid the shame
comment in response to post
Need to get one of these bad boys installed on a corner.
comment in response to post
Can't tell if this is a reference to the Apple TV show or Edgewood. Because honestly could be either.
comment in response to post
“The constitution vests the executive power into the President (See Article II). Therefore he can do whatever he wants (See SCOTUS)”
comment in response to post
Just as the Constitution says
comment in response to post
Long overdue
comment in response to post
ABOLISH ANIMAL CONTROL
comment in response to post
Wanting them to be deported nonetheless
comment in response to post
This was a play, not a whole playbook that you had to rewrite. Fairly easy to copy without being part of a coaching tree.
comment in response to post
See, it is a health & safety issue!
comment in response to post
“wE’Re a REpUbLIc aNd NOt a DemOCraCy” “will of the people is supreme!”
comment in response to post
Yet for some reason you and others have argued that focus needs to be on Biden and his family personally. The issue is not Biden. The issue is that Dems across the party are resistant to passing on the torch until forced. RBG - Biden - Congress - Governors
comment in response to post
No no no Hat, he’s just upset that a terrorist organization is getting more special treatment from the courts than Covid religious objections. There could be no other possible explanation for why an injunction was needed so urgently in this case.
comment in response to post
Not to mention that congressional authorization is not the only source of judicial jurisdiction.
comment in response to post
Up next our new podcast, Some Things Considered
comment in response to post
More that he wants to keep a crypto firehouse of cash from being deployed against him
comment in response to post
What makes you say Esteves is worse than McBath?
comment in response to post
The Reds are what they always are. A .500 team
comment in response to post
People are asking a lot of questions that are answered by my “We are not the gestapo” shirt.
comment in response to post
It’s an inter-party fight on which consultants and strategists get paid big DNC $$ for the cycle. Completely useless.
comment in response to post
“Our county wide public school performance is only good because we keep out poorer kids” is a revealing statement, but not in the way Ragsdale thinks.
comment in response to post
*Fertility* clinic would be the more common internet punctuation to emphasize a word
comment in response to post
economics.mit.edu/news/assurin...
comment in response to post
“Yes, the government did in fact intend to do exactly what the playoffs said they were planning on doing, but we only found definitive proof of that later, therefore this court was out of bounds to put a stop to it”
comment in response to post
That's what drove the initial bank stock surge - corporate world thinking that FTC and deregulation would drive a surge of M&A activity.
comment in response to post
*scratches* Just one more lane man, I just need one more lane
comment in response to post
Media loves to smell blood in the water and get a scalp, especially if it's something clear cut that they can take a principled stance on without dirtying themselves with politics. Voters often care less about inside baseball. This has always and will always be true.
comment in response to post
That’s awful
comment in response to post
Link to my paid blog in the comments below!
comment in response to post
Now obviously this is not a problem for them because they don’t actually want transit. It’s always been a smokescreen to delay and kill any projects. Just like “a second beeline trail would preserve transit corridor for the future!”
comment in response to post
In seriousness, they still haven’t grappled with the internal logic of their proposals. They want a second lane that can take bikes, scooters, and presumably Beep Autonomous vehicles. What do you think an AV does when surrounded by bikes and scooters? It stops.
comment in response to post
Where do you think they’ll get the funding to build it? PPP deal with variable tolls to maintain a belt line express way! Peach Pass for your bike baaabbyyy!