mrdetermined.bsky.social
1,576 posts
427 followers
439 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Nope! All BS. Love how owned you are over this.
Which sitting president tried to have a coup to overturn valid election results? Which president said he wasn't sure if he would follow the Constitution? Answer-
comment in response to
post
False. They never had the votes to codify Roe. Love how you just admitted you don't know a thing about how the law works because the SCOTUS overturned it and that has nothing to do with who holds both chambers.
Oh, that Senate "majority" was 50 votes, not the 60 you need.
The GOP is at fault.
comment in response to
post
Again, total BS from you.
If the families are so similar, please cite the immediate Biden family members who worked for the White House. Then cite the Biden crypto businesses that they had. Like the Trump family.
When you DON'T provide what I asked, it will prove you're lying and owned.
comment in response to
post
Please show me where the Democrats have rolled back civil rights, voting rights, taken away the right of abortion, and have broken the law like the GOP has.
I'll wait, and you'll never do it.
comment in response to
post
You're completely full of crap. Anyone who didn't vote FOR Harris has to own their FAIL in not keeping fascists out of office.
comment in response to
post
Biden/Harris didn't support genocide. They had a different way of approaching Israel because the world is more complicated than you pretend it is.
Trump was clearly fascist, so there was no excuse in NOT voting for Harris against him. None. Own your FAIL.
comment in response to
post
False. If you couldn't see that Trump was completely unacceptable by yourself, YOU are the problem.
comment in response to
post
Anyone who accuses Biden/Harris of supporting genocide is always full of crap.
Tell us how there is no difference with how Trump is treating the rule of law. I'll wait.
comment in response to
post
Total BS. Look at what Trump is doing in 150 days, including Gaza. You may swallow that BS but not the rest of us.
comment in response to
post
No they didn't. If you didn't vote for them you let the fascists win.
comment in response to
post
The fascists are on the other side and everyone knows it. Owned AGAIN.
comment in response to
post
I am right. No copium here. Lots of denial and defeat from you.
comment in response to
post
Actually, you're correct. He said he is not running for head of the WI state party. He did so after he didn't get the DNC nod, so it wasn't like he resigned to run. I'm sure he's not going far from WI.
One source I read said Martin is just as effective but more low key.
comment in response to
post
Again, you're completely unserious and defeated.
comment in response to
post
They are still run by Wikler. Many people have equally good things to say about Ken Martin.
comment in response to
post
And you would be completely full of shit. She did NOT want to be a Republican at all. She wanted to expand health care coverage and add in help with senior parents. Everything you said is laughably wrong.
comment in response to
post
Love how owned you are-
comment in response to
post
That's completely wrong.
In no way did they have policies closer to Trump. "Large voter bases" were NOT "abandoned."
A lunatic fascist was the other choice. This is on everyone who did not vote for her- period.
comment in response to
post
Nope! I'm dishing out the facts and data and you're just melting down.
And then there's THIS-
www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/int...
comment in response to
post
So, as always, you have no argument. Got it. 🥱
comment in response to
post
I have. Deal with it.
comment in response to
post
This is English for "you guys have been owned each time" and I'm not sorry to say it.
I'm not awkward, but you are projecting.
comment in response to
post
Sumner was no progressive. He probably gave to influence the Dems for the worse.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
They are not profiles in courage and they did not get where they are by standing up to right wing bullies. BTW the person that is singularly behind this is the owner, the daughter of Sumner Redstone who passed away a few years ago. She's the one that want to give Trump "what he wants."
comment in response to
post
Again, false.
You want to be defeatist and hand a "victory" to them, that's your problem.
Stay out of the way of the people working to fix it who know that we haven't already lost.
comment in response to
post
Trump did not crack 50% of the popular vote.
Trump did not get a substantial increase in his vote numbers given the increase of the population.
Harris vote represents a bunch of people that did NOT VOTE, as opposed to so many more people voting FOR Trump. Facts.
comment in response to
post
I've been owning these guys with every volley and none of you can argue it. Come back to reality some day.
comment in response to
post
All of that is complete BS. Try again.
comment in response to
post
I think that is the real story of how we've gotten here.
Just on health care and drug prices alone, the Dems are doing far more than the GOP for the Bottom 90% on those issues. Do they get the votes for doing it? Not from everyone that benefits. Privilege comes before that.
comment in response to
post
Because I am a political junkie, and come to this on my own, I put the blame on the voters. Which is myopic, admittedly.
I'm well aware that we have a segment of the population that will, and is, constantly voting against their economic interests to support their identity politics.
comment in response to
post
No, you can't argue it.
The fact that American emissions alone would change is a big deal. The fact that they will get worse under Trump is also a big deal. Don't argue either one.
comment in response to
post
I'm going off actual history. People want to think that they are temporarily not rich and act as if they are going to be rich, someday. That's easier than facing the fact about not ever being rich.
It took a depression to change that mentality.
comment in response to
post
Because they are attempting a sale/merger that needs federal approval. The people running Paramount think this is the fastest/easiest way to make it happen- give him what he wants. They forgot about the part where it's never enough.
comment in response to
post
No. Because the substance is winning with the educated and accurately informed.
The "spectacle" may "win" with the oligarchs manipulating the un- and misinformed, but I'm not counting that. Why? I'm not giving credit for the most powerful forces winning over the most ignorant over their biases.
comment in response to
post
Believe it or not, there are more sane Americans than not.
comment in response to
post
This is false.
States run the elections. A bunch of states, including many of our largest, are run by Democrats.
Just stop with this.
comment in response to
post
They argue in terms of damage, perhaps. No equivalent radiation due to no nuclear weapons.
Still NO EVIDENCE of global CO2 vs just Gaza from you. I win.
comment in response to
post
I agree with all that.
The difference is that I refuse to give those voters & non-voters a pass, regardless of the specific reasons. They fucked around, and we're all going to find out.
Harris voters don't deserve it- the rest do. But that's the consequence.
comment in response to
post
I asked you for the effects of CO2 globally vs. just in Gaza, and you have not provided them.
Because the FACTS prove that I'm right. So cut your shit.
comment in response to
post
Nope! I proved my facts, you have no argument against them.
Thanks for being REALLY bad at this. Get a new hobby, dude. 🙄
comment in response to
post
Were nuclear bombs dropped in Gaza? NO.
End of story.
comment in response to
post
Not an argument.
Would Harris be undermining the renewable energy investments as Trump is? THAT is the question, and since the answer proves that I'm right you're running away from it with complete BS. Thanks for losing!
comment in response to
post
I clearly know more about how the Earth works than you do. You just proved it.
Provide CO2 emissions for the ENTIRE planet vs. just that of Gaza. Go-
comment in response to
post
Please provide global data of CO2 emissions vs. that just contained to Gaza. Do so with a link from a legit outlet.
Until you provide that, my point stands and you can't argue it.
comment in response to
post
No, I don't agree with that on the moderates.
We saw this over a 100 years ago in the Glided Age. Middle class Americans (and some working class) fell for the BS from the oligarchs. Then they lost in the Great Depression, and they voted left.
comment in response to
post
Not a weird way. I have the argument and you don't.
Climate change is more important than Gaza. You don't think so? You're wrong- the sustainability of the planet comes ahead of any regional conflict.
The fact that you keep LYING that she "supported genocide" means you're not serious.