nutty.land
Haskell, climbing, blacksmithing; occasional SCAdian. I work on the core Zcash team at https://electriccoin.co and build software for worker-owned cooperatives at https://aftok.com by night.
Signal: @nuttycom.01
3,196 posts
1,298 followers
1,076 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Get the labeler.
comment in response to
post
This isn’t to say that such a solution to coordination problems can’t exist, but it empirically doesn’t exist *yet*. Hierarchy appears to be some sort of (at least locally) maximum; it’d be great if it weren’t for all the downsides.
comment in response to
post
“combine” is the trick word here. Coordination problems are profound; hierarchies “solve” them and are easily implemented. In order for anarchic responses to succeed, anarchists must find a *more efficient and easier to implement* solution than hierarchy.
comment in response to
post
‘if let Some(foo) { … }’ is right there for the imperative folks.
comment in response to
post
.unwrap() should only exist under \#[cfg(test)]
comment in response to
post
I love the “I have friends everywhere” sign. So simple and yet it kind of says everything necessary.
comment in response to
post
These squeaks need to be played over a loudspeaker any time that Trump shows up somewhere.
comment in response to
post
You’re going to ruin the boot leather with all that slobber.
comment in response to
post
We are all coping for more materialist and other structural reasons—and yes, those absolutely play a role—but social media is the dead body at the scene of every one of these crises. It is the great social flattener. It selects for the greatest neuroses in us and demands propagation.
comment in response to
post
Dick Gaughan will be honored if you use his music. youtu.be/2Nf1mtMMdt8
comment in response to
post
Perl. And it was good.
comment in response to
post
"Plaintiffs and the citizens of Los Angeles face a greater harm from the continued unlawful militarization of their city."
comment in response to
post
"Regardless of the outcome of this case or any other, [Trump's invoking 10 USC 12406 against a governor's wishes] threatens serious injury to the constitutional balance of power between the federal and state governments, and it sets a dangerous precedent for future domestic military activity.
comment in response to
post
They’re asking that the sanctions be levied against the individual attorneys and have noted that precedent exists to support the court prohibiting the government from reimbursing them.
comment in response to
post
And again, I find it telling that the very arguments made for why we must push immediately and desperately into AI—that it will create infinite wealth and intelligence—suddenly vanish when it comes to sharing that wealth with IP holders or using that intelligence to build fairer systems…
comment in response to
post
The boot will never lick you back.
comment in response to
post
You can't obstruct an investigation which doesn't exist. An investigation can't exist without a suspicion of a crime.
comment in response to
post
When a cop tries to enter a place the law doesn't allow them to enter, because they have no warrant and no valid suspicion of crime, you send them away. You do not enable crime from the people who are supposed to prevent it. Standing in the way to protect innocents is not just legal, but important
comment in response to
post
For those not following the drama earlier, it's for sharing this piece advocating for nonviolence (but not being judgy about how targeted people respond either). And saying some things about governmental/ institutional violence.
comment in response to
post
This was coming, and if they had waited patiently they might have made a much more convincing case for a takeover (as part of response to "looting" after a natural disaster for example, or more actually major protests).
But nope, Miller had to have his quotas met and settle high school grudges.
comment in response to
post
The “way less politically viable” assertion is one I disagree with. Everybody understands rating systems, they’re ubiquitous in our everyday lives. Approval doesn’t give voters any ability to express nuanced preferences, and that’s a stumbling block; it’s why people think they want RCV instead.
comment in response to
post
STAR voting is even better on these issues: starvoting.us
comment in response to
post
Like, you write some CSS, is it correct? On various devices? What does correct even mean? Humans can go “yeah that looks okay” but that judgement is deeply subjective (and usually results in hours of arguments about what “looks better.”)
comment in response to
post
The state space that you have to deal with to get ELF encoding right is also kind of microscopic compared to the state space that CSS has to manipulate. I have be using claude for some CSS stuff recently as well and I think that the lack of a correctness oracle is a huge problem.
comment in response to
post
So many people behave like they believe they’re living in a novel, and I don’t know what to do about it. The stories have taken over. Ubiquitous entertainment has utterly broken people’s brains.
comment in response to
post
This labeler is really helpful:
comment in response to
post
Oh wait, I get it, this is the ETH folks who are *interested* in privacy hacking on stuff and you’re wanting to interest them in atproto. Never mind!
comment in response to
post
What does Ethereum have to do with privacy?
comment in response to
post
"Defendants have also not shown that any of the protests have rendered the President 'unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.' ... Violation of the Posse Comitatus Act is imminent, if not already underway."
comment in response to
post
It cost my family $500 per person for round-trip tickets to Helsinki last January. We stayed in youth hostels; it was fantastic, and *far* cheaper (and more enjoyable) than going to any theme park could ever possibly be.
comment in response to
post
There are some people who are genuinely deserving of vigilante justice.
comment in response to
post
At the expense of the fundamental human right to freedom of movement? GTFO.
It makes no sense that where someone is allowed to exist depends on the location of their birth, something that they have no control over.
comment in response to
post
It's the specific, publicly authorized & legitimate capacity for violence that requires the police be denied a separate, independent form of collective power. The professional agents of public violence must not be able to act independently of democratically legitimate leadership.
comment in response to
post
Colorado is pretty great.
comment in response to
post
I continue to believe that whether or not AI can “reason” is almost irrelevant. People can use it for things, and they’re going to use it for both good and ill and that’s going to have profound effects on society. Do we end up at AGI? I can’t tell, but capabilities are going to continue to increase.
comment in response to
post
The X model of “pay for extended posts” is actually a good one. And the whole “spaces” integration or whatever it’s called is a good idea too. BlueSky would be well served to crib the good ideas and charge for them.
comment in response to
post
I keep hoping that some day we’ll get a functioning micropayments system for the internet. What Brave is doing with BAT could be genuinely transformative if people could get it into their heads that it’s better to be a customer than a product.
comment in response to
post
I don’t think going to X is the answer though; X is useless in an entirely different fashion.