onahill.bsky.social
Tries to care about more than my own immediate life.
38 posts
7 followers
52 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Well of course it *is* a humiliation. It’s yet more proof that their unicorns and rainbows Brexit was the product of their hopeless idiocy and delusion that can’t stand the test of reality and is unraveling.
comment in response to
post
Less edgy but any reason you wouldn’t be the Good (Great/Positive etc) impression press?
comment in response to
post
It’s both. Some breeds are more dangerous because of temperament and power. Bad owners are often though not exclusively drawn to dogs who carry this threat. You can’t ban people though so banning dangerous breeds remains a good idea.
comment in response to
post
I think you may be projecting 😂
comment in response to
post
I think you may be conflating “men are being asked not to do trashy behaviours“ with calling men trash. This is a manoeuvre enacted by reactionary narratives .
comment in response to
post
I fear it is the same reasons they revoted Trump in ☹️ and is stoked by deliberate foreign state misinformation
comment in response to
post
And yet none (as near as dammit) of the UK’s children under about 15 (?) have had a single jab nor it seems will get one …ever?
comment in response to
post
Been thrown over the head of one of those too !
comment in response to
post
One of mine is being tossed head of heels on the horns of a petting zoo goat
comment in response to
post
My incubator is running and full
comment in response to
post
Brexit did that too and hurt and annoyed our allies. But we aren’t such a big market so the impact was less
comment in response to
post
Nah even before the utter scandal of the last months I know our fleet cut them on cost. We’d now cut them on reputations grounds and pragmatically that vandalism risk just shot upon
comment in response to
post
Felt a knee jerk denial of the possibility come over me (cross party bitterness over party gate and the longer view of Brexit damage). But yeah it needs to be watched a fought tooth and nail.
comment in response to
post
Well how could they do it AGAIN is a fair question
comment in response to
post
Same author
comment in response to
post
Sadly, since I don’t think Trump cares about consensus and national stability he will care about protests. The economy could rot as long as he is feathering his own nest
comment in response to
post
Has she not noticed that they call themselves *trans*?
comment in response to
post
My theory on this has always been that they consider it a madness/abomination to *choose* to be a (trans) woman. It threatens their belief in the innate supremacy of maleness.
comment in response to
post
Attacking the judiciary was always coming next.
comment in response to
post
If she’s talking about hydrogen, yes.
comment in response to
post
Came her to make the same point
comment in response to
post
if I ran the world I’d start by legislating on new products needing to meet criteria on whether they really are worth the environmental cost to manufacture. And gradually making all “stuff” more expensive. It would reduce fun and frivolity which is a little sad but better than dying as a race
comment in response to
post
Undeniably we need to stop burning fossil fuels as a matter of urgency. But consuming our way out of climate change is clearly also a false paradigm. Both can be true.
comment in response to
post
Smoking and vaping is gross to those of us who don’t. I’d rather not share my social spaces with people doing it because it stinks. It’s just banning an antisocial habit like spitting.
comment in response to
post
So maddened watching this and hearing how Adam Peaty has gone deaf in one ear. If course the athletes want to try. Where’s the safeguarding from the coaches and team managers not to mention the IOC
comment in response to
post
And we are in the taikwando men’s heavyweight gold medal bout
comment in response to
post
Synchro swimming if that floats your boat (medal chance)
comment in response to
post
Your match is not more important than the women’s. They don’t care if you won or lost. They don’t have to. If you need to resort to bad language you don’t have a reasonable argument
comment in response to
post
When congratulated but told that they could celebrate that off the pitch, they resorted to telling women’s to F off.
Men do not be this shit.
comment in response to
post
I always just cut a chunk of marzipan onto the plate with my un-iced (but yes home made) cake so you’re already one better than me.
comment in response to
post
You should test for Covid - this is the symptoms of the latest wave and there is waaay more covid prevalence than Noro. And test your stools not your nose/throat
comment in response to
post
A headline that reeks of bias. What do his denials matter when the judge ruled - based on hard evidence- he was complicit?