Profile avatar
philocamillus.bsky.social
130 posts 72 followers 265 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
This is very true from a property tax perspective, but I also think of the aggregate investment and resulting value that these cities forego. We’re talking many trillions of dollars spent on land, materials, and most importantly, labor.
comment in response to post
Remember when Biden averted a war between Iran and Israel? That was cool
comment in response to post
This is the most interesting test for me. Pick a few examples like this and see if the AI can come up with them with the information available then.
comment in response to post
What tunnels are under consideration?
comment in response to post
I find the print issue to have a much better ratio, but plenty of both
comment in response to post
Just like he did with the job market. Too many jobs.
comment in response to post
Yes. It would look a lot like the Biden agenda with the IRA and Chips Act. Not sure how you steer those investments from the sun belt to rust belt though.
comment in response to post
As perhaps a younger reader, I don’t know much about the guns and butter inflation of the 60s
comment in response to post
4 students of 300.
comment in response to post
Fwiw, I teach in environmental studies, Silicon Valley public university/Calstate, upper division intro env law, energy and environment, solar energy analysis, and sustainable energy. I ask students of each how many have heard of the Inflation Reduction Act 1st day of class? Wanna guess percentage?
comment in response to post
So much of the anti-Biden coverage was focused on his speech impediment.
comment in response to post
I confess that I do not know this about chocolate
comment in response to post
This list is right but the filibuster point is shorthand for overall obstruction of the country’s best interests while a Democrat is president. He was the biggest force in hamstringing the country’s response to the global financial crisis from 2009-2016.
comment in response to post
Another reason Doug Jones should have been AG is that Dems should have a rule of appointing folks like this to the cabinet or ambassadorships if they lose. But they have to take the shot.
comment in response to post
Thank you, this is more accurate. The Obama era policies were an inadequate response, which had to be a major contributing factor to Trump’s election, but these were failures of Congress. Sometimes I think I’m the only one who remembers the Americans Jobs Act.
comment in response to post
He preserved the union. I disagree with the statement that he violated the constitution.
comment in response to post
No he didn’t
comment in response to post
It’s a great example of history never ending. When it comes to governments, no victory or defeat is permanent.
comment in response to post
Yeah, it is uncool apparently to say people should be kind
comment in response to post
Sad to see
comment in response to post
Continued sprawl is such a mistake. I could maybe support developing some marginal land with dense housing, but 300 more SFHs is saddening.
comment in response to post
It underscores the urgency of acting now, always.
comment in response to post
Meanwhile, the US underinvested in infrastructure and housing in the low rate environment of the 2010s. YIMBY reforms are much needed, but wow, there is no making up for the housing (and transit) projects that would have penciled in 2009-2019 but don’t now due to costs and interest rates.
comment in response to post
It’s also important to build as early as possible because conditions won’t always allow it. Madrid accomplished its major expansion project just in time for the financial crisis to occur, which prohibited future development.
comment in response to post
It’s always crazy for an American to read stories like this, where the left and center right politicians competed on who could build a better metro.
comment in response to post
I wonder if we should start leveraging utility costs to argue for housing density. More dense housing means more people to share the fixed costs. It’s a bank shot but it’s the same logic as there would be for property taxes if not for Prop 13.
comment in response to post
Who’s Next?
comment in response to post
Bring back sidewalks that enable two people to walk abreast
comment in response to post
It’s really a great theory. It’s on the mind these days.
comment in response to post
*Andy walks through his front door at 4am after a long day. He sees his buddy Lou sitting inside.* Andy: Lou? It’s 4am!? Lou: Not in Hong Kong it isn’t. Great line, or the greatest line?
comment in response to post
Andy Barker PI is underrated