Profile avatar
robvirtue.bsky.social
Hydrogeologist, geochemist, sailor, gardener, curator of architectural, automotive and marine antiquities. Science is neither left nor right. It’s just science.
131 posts 144 followers 266 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Easy! Just ignore Scope 3. Maybe Scope 2 as well. And Scope 1.
comment in response to post
No thanks, on both counts.
comment in response to post
The voices are telling him.
comment in response to post
I didn’t know Angus was also a numerologist.
comment in response to post
Why would Clive care? He never spends his own money. Usually taps into his worker’s super and wages, … er..allegedly.
comment in response to post
It’S sTiLl tOo eArLY.
comment in response to post
I don’t think the oil, gas and salmon industries will be overly worried.
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
Found one!
comment in response to post
So much mud.
comment in response to post
Smeared!! Smeared, I tells ya!
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
Ha! I just posted this to a family chat when that was announced
comment in response to post
It’s too early for that John.
comment in response to post
“Somebody needs to ban James McGrath.” Fixed it for you:-)
comment in response to post
I’m expecting Bob Katter to pipe in “But I ain't spending any time on it because in the meantime, every three months, a person is torn to pieces by an electric shark in a Norwegian fjord."
comment in response to post
He was, as most other scientists are, perfectly aware of the impact of orbital and axis orientation changes, AKA Milankovitch Cycles. They are not responsible for the current temperature increase. science.nasa.gov/science-rese...
comment in response to post
“We Used to Know”. The original and the best.
comment in response to post
I’m no law talking guy but I don’t think an organisation can be defamed, only individuals.
comment in response to post
A bit like the TAB and The Golden Casket (QLD), back in the day.
comment in response to post
Is a Swiss railway organisation proposing it?
comment in response to post
There are possibly worse places to place solar panels, but I’m struggling to think of any. A nightmare for installation and maintenance access- working inside a rail corridor has very high safety requirements and would significantly disrupt rail traffic. They would also get very dirty very quickly.
comment in response to post
Going back for her hat?
comment in response to post
They are not the worst floods in 50 years. They have surpassed the floods from 50 years ago (1974). They are the worst recorded floods, i.e. since European settlement.
comment in response to post
Unfortunately, it’s the other way around. Australia had a contract to buy diesel French subs but got sucked into forking out the better part of a bil $ deposit on joint nuke subs from the US with the UK (AUKUS). Oh , & we had to pay the French contractors millions for breaking the contract.
comment in response to post
They robably want to stop those pesky CO ₂ graphs. Shooting the messenger seems to have become one of their core policies. Obviously a long way behind pocketing lots of cash, but still core.
comment in response to post
Stanthorpe says “Hi!”. :-)
comment in response to post
That could explain the mass fish mortalities.
comment in response to post
It was terrible at lunchtime today. The temperature was far too mild and the sun too bright. People should stay away.
comment in response to post
Why did he change his name to Aussie Trump? Were Richard Cranium and Wayne Kerr taken?
comment in response to post
🥁🥁 🥁
comment in response to post
Choice!
comment in response to post
Nice minerals you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to them.
comment in response to post
Surely JK could distil the tea towel down to one law, and sell it as a nice embroidery in a blackwood frame.
comment in response to post
Inverse Poe’s Law.
comment in response to post
Their previous dodgy CEO “retired” back in the 1940s. Just before a hostile takeover.
comment in response to post
Ok, how about “Ethnic Cleansing”?
comment in response to post
Yep and it’s going to get worse. Yet they keep up the charade that the economy needs coal. Climate change is going to cost way more.