sirlunastera.bsky.social
I’m genetically distinct.
142 posts
78 followers
205 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Yep. once again we have a graph that is really burying the lead - the y-axis starts at 30%, and like the overwhelming majority of the dots whether they are red or blue are above 50%. The reality is this is not a partisan issue for voters even if media and politicians try to make it seem that way
comment in response to
post
My Birth Certificate is from California and all my documents say I’m a woman - sounds to me like I’m just a cis woman in Britain now..?
comment in response to
post
That last line is an express statement saying that *without* God’s help, all Gazans will die at the southern border. Note that.
comment in response to
post
Ngl, I *would* bet 100% of nutrition scientists would agree that animal and plant protein sources are not nutritionally equivalent. I just don’t think they would agree with the National Pork Board on how that difference in nutrition pans out 😂
Masterclass in headline writing right here 💩
comment in response to
post
The utter stupidity and audacity to applaud celebrities in the 90’s, like Boy George and Madonna, in the same article as blaming the gay community for the restrictions placed on the female body is SO FUCKING WILD. Who the *actual fuck* do you think those celebrities were emulating???! 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
comment in response to
post
Why does this slap so hard though
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
ROFL accurate
comment in response to
post
“doesn’t really hold water” feels a little dishonest
comment in response to
post
I think you’re choosing to view “they suck and aren’t useful” in a very flat, 2-dimensional manner. Most people *have* legitimate reasons why they say such a statement and you’ve identified some of them in your post (environmentally damaging, economically harmful, etc.) so to say that the statement
comment in response to
post
😂😂
comment in response to
post
MAJOR Victory in Montana!
Bill that would criminalize parents with felony child endangerment DIES in Montana after 15 Republicans cross party lines.
The bill would have criminalized even parents of trans kids driving through the state.
It died after nonbinary rep Howell delivered a strong speech.
comment in response to
post
In direct communication with each other, bought the dip. The ability of institutions to coordinate their selling and buying of assets is an essential component to increasing their profits, and that kind of coordination doesn’t exist with retail investors.
comment in response to
post
Up. And basically whether or not we see another plummet is going to be based on if everyone who “bought the dip” tries to sell at roughly the same time or if they sell it slowly so that the supply never gets above the demand. The main risk here is that LOTS of retail investors, who likely aren’t
comment in response to
post
My (very limited and likely incorrect) understanding is that there’s a belief that the “bottom” of the dip was reached yesterday. At this point you’re looking at less stock being sold as people hold their assets - less supply of the stock means there is a presumption of more demand ergo, price goes
comment in response to
post
Canadian here.
comment in response to
post
Isn’t a loss.
comment in response to
post
A lot of people’s non-retirement savings being just completely wiped out. I’m concerned these buyers are not people who can hold these positions for months, and institutional traders will be able to wait them out as the buyers slowly bleed money when they realize there is no quick sell that
comment in response to
post
DEFINITELY found the egg 🤣🤣
comment in response to
post
Found the egg…
comment in response to
post
I’m so proud of you Massachusetts 🥹 doing the lord’s work out there. We’re #1 in vandalism!! 🤝
comment in response to
post
Men will literally do ANYTHING but go to therapy, where they could also learn about mindfulness - I’m sorry, “onto-reflexive whatever-the-fuck”
comment in response to
post
Then yeah, we probably can’t continue this discussion because we’re working from two different premises - i ABSOLUTELY can imagine human sexual characteristics that could fall outside of human anatomy and I know LOTS of people who can too.
comment in response to
post
I can want to be on both testosterone and estrogen and neither ALL at the same time, because mental states are not simple black and white snapshots.
comment in response to
post
Sought medical treatment do” that’s pretty categorically nonsensical, because even the “true transsexuals” don’t all have the same experiences - negative and positive. So that can’t be the categorical distinction.
This is also all without acknowledging that the mind is not a binary thing -
comment in response to
post
It sounds like you would say that person is not transsexual and yet the difference between myself and that person before I sought medical treatment is simply a religious belief?
If the reason that person isn’t transsexual is because “they don’t experience the same things transsexuals who have…
comment in response to
post
What about people who don’t seek medical treatment due to religious reasons? Ie. a person born AFAB, who feels like and wants to be seen as a man, but for religious reasons such as “this is the body god gave me” or something, and so does not desire nor seek medical treatment?
comment in response to
post
A person who doesn’t want a penis NOR a vagina/vulva?
People who look at the current medical options - which I think we can all agree are woefully inadequate because the research and investment in this field is stupidly small - and say “none of this is for me.” Are they not “true transsexuals”?