unknownthatha.bsky.social
46 posts
24 followers
70 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Now they’re blaming a low-level staffer. And here he’s floating some contacts-based conspiracy. But he added the number to the chat. So, if he was tricked, whose number did he think it was he was adding?
comment in response to
post
It’s weird because I could have sworn that some of us were told we had a psychological disorder for having concerns this would be the case.
comment in response to
post
And it’s one thing for him to hide behind the fact that he has to carry out Trump’s foreign policy. No one’s forcing him to tweet abject drivel like this.
Of course tweets like this are essentially Trump’s foreign policy, so. . .
comment in response to
post
What?
comment in response to
post
So for all the MAGA people who think they’ve sent a champion to go “clean up Washington,” and who claim to hate politicians because they’re “corrupt,” how do they process this?
comment in response to
post
There was this guy:
pbs.twimg.com/media/FEvRZ4...
comment in response to
post
I think the OP is confusing the CFPB with the Consumer Product Safety Commission, but Musk is horrendous and frivolous either way.
comment in response to
post
Even at their most triumphalist, right-wing populists are psychologically reliant on an indelible sense of being in a permanent outsidership. There will always be a swamp, or a deep state, or a uniparty to go up against in a cartoonish "us against the empire" dramaturgy.
comment in response to
post
Haha. Fair. I just didn’t know if there was something more direct floating around.
comment in response to
post
I’ve seen these PED allegations against RFK Jr. and frankly didn’t have the time/motivation to investigate further. How do we know this is the case (not that I’d be surprised)?
comment in response to
post
The sad thing here is that anyone building resilience to anything is a good thing, but to take this extra wild step of acting like, if only black people develop resilience, *it doesn’t matter how much racism there is* is asinine.
comment in response to
post
Re #2, led away by Pam Bondi’s DOJ? You’re joking.
comment in response to
post
The lowest of bars.
comment in response to
post
Scott Jennings et al:
“Guys, it’s really simple. He’s said he has nothing to do with Project 2025.”
**shrugs exasperatedly and rolls eyes so hard they get stuck inside skull**
comment in response to
post
Populism.
comment in response to
post
Are they going to look into the waste related to the Weaponization of Government committee?
comment in response to
post
I have been sharing this for others’ consideration re the threshold for blocking.
bsky.app/profile/unkn...
comment in response to
post
I appreciate these, but I offer this additional thought re blocking (hope this doesn’t count as arguing!):
bsky.app/profile/unkn...
comment in response to
post
Just a point of curiosity regarding you approach on here. Why not quote post or tag Bari here? I think your point is worth her (and her audience) hearing, and we’re not dealing with an irredeemable troll like Jack Posobiec.
comment in response to
post
Kash Patel is terrifying. I get he’s not nominated yet, but why wouldn’t Trump do it at this point?
comment in response to
post
Looks good, but what was your vehicle for the hummus? Bread? Veggies? A spoon?
comment in response to
post
2/ But a solely left-wing mutual appreciation/congratulation society on here won’t do us any good. If anything, I fear it will skew our understanding of reality. Removing any challenging or difficult-to-contend-with views from your feed, won’t increase our chances of regaining power any time soon.
comment in response to
post
Excuse me, it’s even more ridiculous - “feels the pulse on issues related to food.” Complete gibberish.
comment in response to
post
Also, food goes into your body. It has researchable effects. What on earth does having one’s “finger on the pulse” of food mean?
comment in response to
post
Seriously. The idea that you would look at someone like Liz Cheney vs. a spineless person like Marco Rubio and conclude that Cheney was the one driven by a desire for power is ridiculous.
comment in response to
post
These are all people suing their employers for phantom HIPAA violations.
comment in response to
post
Can someone please consolidate somewhere every Republican/conservative politician or media figure that tried to claim Trump wasn’t actually going to do mass deportation, much less use the military to do it? I don’t want them to ever be able to claim they never said it.
comment in response to
post
What do you think the top few contributing factors were that resulted in VP Harris losing?
comment in response to
post
Imagine your first post being a “biological fact.”
*I’ve joined a new social media platform. Can’t wait to meet my neighbors*
First post: “OCTOPUSES HAVE THREE HEARTS!!”
comment in response to
post
These are the same people who will be eager to remind you that you’re not any better/more able than anyone else to begin with. So why you’re not allowed to participate in the conversation on equal terms is not clear.
comment in response to
post
On the one hand, yes. On the other hand, much like Brady, when Mahomes gets the ball with two minutes down by less than a TD, it almost feels as if he’s more likely to win than not. Makes the decision to go easier.
comment in response to
post
There’s no shame in his game, Radley.
comment in response to
post
I’m pretty sure this pre-dates any statement from Biden pushing for “Trump style” border legislation, no?
comment in response to
post
😂 fair enough. I thought it was worth him seeing Nicholas’s post because Piers seems to buy into the line of argument being parodied there.
comment in response to
post
Cc: @piersmorgan.bsky.social
comment in response to
post
The people who need to not accept this framing most urgently are the junior officers who are about to be promoted on the assumption that they’ll follow corrupt and unlawful orders from Trump.
comment in response to
post
2/ But some objected to a seeming proclivity toward attempted cancellation as a single sanction for anything remotely offensive that seemed ascendant on the left for some time (e.g., tagging someone’s employer and asking if they’re “ok with this” for minor transgressions). I think that’s TCW.