vyzaj.bsky.social
Cybernetic Judas || Mediamancer || Get off my swamp
376 posts
633 followers
2,505 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
That may be so for small operations, but im extremely skeptical that this is true at scale.
Mostly im agnostic about economic policy - if it can be demonstrated to work then cool - but its all the 'anyone who opposes needs to be reeducated or hard labor' stuff that i dont like.
comment in response to
post
fuck yeah man its all starting to come together
comment in response to
post
its a nice idea, but it seems like in practice that involves rounding up a load of people and putting them in camps, then rewriting history about it & quibbling over the numbers.
The least you could do is try to repackage these policies without all the murderous mascots. My 2 cents anyways.
comment in response to
post
mostly its just this.
comment in response to
post
ngl the thighs should be registered as deadly weapons
comment in response to
post
christmas you genius
comment in response to
post
i mean the whole 'hyperborean black sun esoteric third-positionist' stuff, they were clever enough to repackage it cause its nearly impossible to rehab hitler. The same is true for all these regimes, you might as well be arguing that p diddy was a nuanced guy with a lot of good ideas.
comment in response to
post
hes a liberal so im betting theres virtually no way he can engage with this subject that you wouldnt call reactionary.
If you want socialist policies you should abandon communism the same way crypto-fascists learned to abandon nazism. The "um ackshully those numbers are too high" shtick is done for.
comment in response to
post
i wonder if this partition will backfire on them; over time they will squeeze out all but the most insane retardation, creating a stagnant pool of tepid content that people pretend to like but dont care about, and then abandon wholesale.
comment in response to
post
yes that one is too bleh
comment in response to
post
holy hell 10 hours dang bro you ever wonder if maybe theres just too much internet out there now
comment in response to
post
thats a good question
comment in response to
post
eh not really, but i do like maps though
comment in response to
post
i can see your tabs
comment in response to
post
just like my grandpappy used to say, post em all and let god sort em out
comment in response to
post
a synesthetic fractal?
thats the best i can do on short notice.
but yeah this trope feels like it should have a name
comment in response to
post
good question.
its not oxymoronic because the image illustrates the point being made (it looks bad and says that)
its not even /that/ ironic - its candid.
I guess i would call it a cogent visual metaphor?
...its not even really a metaphor. A self referential illustration?
feels like a specific thing
comment in response to
post
pack it up brother, you will have to find a new number sequence now.
comment in response to
post
this is quality poasting
comment in response to
post
Deserve? No.
Mobile users should have to cover themselves like a burka at a minimum, and thats just getting started.
For TV users its much more simple, you just make a wallpaper slideshow of website UI - kinda like those toy kitchen stoves that dont actually work - they wont notice the difference.
comment in response to
post
so it begins
comment in response to
post
please can we get this @bsky.app
comment in response to
post
we should have just made a separate internet for mobile scum
comment in response to
post
dang we rlly out here
comment in response to
post
literally me
comment in response to
post
its really only noticeable cause your eyes are so wide open ( and cause you pointed it out ) but who cares your hot also you can keep your eyes on 2 things at once which is a handy advantage
comment in response to
post
is that what computers used to look like in the nebraska days?
comment in response to
post
scoot em all 1989
comment in response to
post
dude thats literally jordan peterson
comment in response to
post
yes.
comment in response to
post
this could have been us but you blocked me =(
comment in response to
post
updooted
comment in response to
post
who made this edit?????
comment in response to
post
this is quality poasting
comment in response to
post
where
comment in response to
post
69
comment in response to
post
the css really boned you on this one
comment in response to
post
yeah but ideally 4thot would have to do it manually at great effort
comment in response to
post
yes i agree but he actually has to USE this one, some of us have to sacrifice ourselves and get banned in chat to nag him to do it or it wont happen, and i salute those brave chatters o7
comment in response to
post
bsky.app/profile/vyza...
comment in response to
post
ill take your word for it. i dont follow tate and didnt see the ban, but its not hard to imagine he did a hatespeech violation.
Also full disclosure; i didnt read those rules before posting - i figure if my common sense isnt sufficient and get i banned then so be it i dont belong here.
comment in response to
post
yes i guess my point was if tate is banned for being a toxic huckster, so too should a bunch of other things to be consistent.
Maybe thats not a bad thing - but tate isnt the only one doing technically legal moral grey zone commerce that exploits peoples vulnerabilities. its a weak argument IMO
comment in response to
post
thats reasonable, TOS violations should be transparent ideally.
I still dont exactly know what the right call is for someone like Tate. I worry about setting bad precedents i.e. 'harassment' being too broad, its upsetting when people don't seem to consider 'how this might backfire' in their outrage.
comment in response to
post
dang we rlly out here
comment in response to
post
how is psychology even real dawg like just bang your mom and castrate your father
comment in response to
post
this is quality poasting
comment in response to
post
proud of you brother