(I realize district court work is a different animal, but as an appellate litigator I would expire right on the spot if a panelist told me I was unprepared for argument by failing to read the record. Just dry up and blow away like I got Snapped right there on the spot.)
Comments
Please?
Are they boobs hired by the Trump administration? Or competent attorneys defending an impossible case badly?
So far Judge rejected DOD's suggestion that Trump v. Hawaii (Travel Ban) means Sec. Hesgeth's anti-trans tweets should not be considered in determining what animated the anti-trans policy.
We're everywhere.
She asks who she should defer to, the 2021 DOD report or the 2025 report, which she says is misleading.