She said one inaccurate thing that I recall, that no American troops were currently in combat zones. I think she tried to correct herself to "war zones," but maybe the moderator should have corrected her. Not a big deal to me, though.
Every time I see a comment like this, the more I think it's supposed to be like those psy-op accounts. They wouldn't have added the "it really feeds into how Trump says everyone is working against him" otherwise
It's the equivalent of planting a seed: real undecided and uninformed voters will go "do people really say that?" And look into it, and that thought will stay in their head. They'll see more and more of people correcting him and it will enforce that people are against him.
It's like the refs at basketball games - invariably, they call fouls against the players committing them, while allowing the players not committing fouls to play WITHOUT A SINGLE PENALTY. How is that fair? Done even get me started on traffic cops not pulling over drivers not committing offenses...
I saw some of the debate and it seemed that Harris was ducking answering questions, however Trump was straight up lying so much they let her get away with it.
What was the alleged false claims that Harris made?
And if Trump is willing to lie about Democrats killing babies immediately after they’re delivered, why does he deserve the benefit of the doubt on any fact check? These people kill me.
Those "claims about abortions" literally stated Democrats were killing babies after they are born. Flat out vile lie that has been used by Nazis and Russian Communists to justify killing 'those other people'. And she's a legal intern? God save us.
Here's a thought for Miss Laura: maybe - just maybe - the fact that the moderators didn't fact-check Harris very often has to do with her not LYING outrageously, blatantly and continually. Give that a little ponder.
Weird that she doesn’t specify what she thinks Harris said that was as egregiously wrong as claiming people from Haiti are eating pets and that abortions happen at nine months.
Insert that 4chan screenshot complaining that leftists have it easier than Nazis because their arguments are based on facts and not easily disproven lies.
i'm not falling for this, within 48 hours someone is going to find out that this person is trump's fluffer and the NYT is just never going to acknowledge that they knew this all along
Post-debate checkers say that there are out-of-date numbers and quotes taken out of context she said...
But that pales in comparison to Trump, where the post debate fact checkers were running out of ways to say he told straight up lies and the fact-checkers only got a fraction of them.
Comments
And if Trump is willing to lie about Democrats killing babies immediately after they’re delivered, why does he deserve the benefit of the doubt on any fact check? These people kill me.
#bothsides
But that pales in comparison to Trump, where the post debate fact checkers were running out of ways to say he told straight up lies and the fact-checkers only got a fraction of them.