When Stanford IT staff and a pro-diversity group shared a list of words they encouraged others not to use, it was national news, despite the fact it never represented campus policy.
When the government erases any mention, data or research related to words, will it be treated as a free speech issue?
When the government erases any mention, data or research related to words, will it be treated as a free speech issue?
Comments
It’s not “diver-city”, it’s “diver-ciTAY”
Wait - we just woke up in a science fiction novel! That's what's going on - did Philip K. Dick write this story? Or maybe it's a Kubrick movie?
It can't be real.
Slam dunk law school hypo.
just because ONE GUY with SUPER THIN SKIN
who is very INSECURE
and wants to CONTROL EVERYTHING HE CAN
doesn't want to hear certain words ... that might upset him.
Even though he's an adult. 79.
And has heard them before.
Shouldn't TRUMP ... be best?
Democraty
Freedom
Election
I’m reading \s as a typo
https://bsky.app/profile/malar0ne.bsky.social/post/3lhtifxbwwc2q
Well, at least Putin thinks so.
Welcome to the kakistocracy.
Or they could delete all mentions of privilege. That’s another option.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/pamela-paul-goodbye-to-the-new-york-times-opinion-columnist.html
And I can't seem to control it
I can't contain it
And I just don't give a shit
You need to feel the way that I feel
Or you'll never fucking know it"
https://youtu.be/fEuaEAkboIw?si=prHEbKyWdIBd4NsY
https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691232607/we-have-never-been-woke?srsltid=AfmBOorZ2YMDVnqfVb0av9f7gu6WBb82jF6WMpNrhjwdDk12RcmGiCGi