i think there's a linguistic slip happening that's important to understanding the appeal of trump to voters- the anonymous banker doesn't get to say those things, hence not using his name in the article, but trump does, hence the vicarious fantasy. my point is it makes it all way more pathetic
Reposted from
Carl T. Bergstrom
If you’re not afraid of getting canceled, you fucking coward, why didn’t you let them print your name?
Comments
It’s all red string and jello in their heads I stg.
these jouissance-laden rituals partaken by the subject behind closed doors (participating in taboo) form the cornerstone of ideological practice and drive identification!
If only.
I’m picking up a hint of old money, mixed with Crypto notes
My guess
JP Morgan 🥂
It’s the Hall Pass of hall passes, hence the glee with which incel/bully/narcissistic types have flocked to perch on the Trump wires.
YOU DONT GET TO STEAL . OR BAN WORDS THAT HAVE MULTIPLE LEGITIMATE USES. IMA GUESS YOU DONT LIKE BANNING BOOKS . BUT LIKE BANNING WORDS ?
I'm now retired, but it occurred to me that the company where I experience the worst racism was also *incompetent as fuck.*
(leading to a major auto co FIRING for piss poor engineering)
Media gives pass to imploding male brain pool.
I hired a woman to work in the lab… and the drivers evaporated.
It's weird how many men are perpetually uncomfortable around women. 🫤
Truly plumbing the depths of embarrassing psychology that you should get over by 25.
'cause it's almost always *white men.*