1) In retrospect (but not necessarily in this specific case), people can see which journalists are working with the Gov to spread or suppress certain information/disinformation.
2) They don't want their email addresses shared with absolutely everyone.
Impersonation are a thing, phisphing schemes love these as now they know which emails are utilized by an organization to reach out to the FBI, which person to impersonate when try to convince a victim they work with the FBI.
If you email in a professional manner, you really should know when to bcc.
Makes perfect sense. So far, ISIS has attacked the Taliban, Iran, Russia, and now New Orleans. Meanwhile, not one bullet has been fired at Israel. And the new Al-Qaeda/ISIS leaders in Syria don't want to fight...Israel??? Even Fox News analysts are going to have a tough time with this one.
Comments
1) In retrospect (but not necessarily in this specific case), people can see which journalists are working with the Gov to spread or suppress certain information/disinformation.
2) They don't want their email addresses shared with absolutely everyone.
but ken wants to paint a picture for his audience
If you email in a professional manner, you really should know when to bcc.
🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠
I’ve encountered this where people aren’t aware that if you print an email that had a BCC in it, that comes up when you print it.
Ooooops 😏
Now excuse me while I do a bunch of email signups to some really weird shit.
Then I realized that you were talking about emails.
Maybe they're afraid?
Maybe it's been hushed up?
it's 2025, metajournalism is in