Trump says using military force to “get Greenland” is on the table
1 / 2
Comments
MAGA, "We need Greenland for security."
REFUSE ILLEGAL ORDERS
We are at a major cross road.
But it would split the military, so .... chaos.
Annexing is the same as expropriation, which is stealing, which is unlawful.
What are scenarios under which Trump can implement martial law
No, I’m dead serious.
Are you really?
And a dipshit.
My2Cents after reading this.
It will be war
Only 199 people were tried at Nuremberg. Only 160-something were convicted. Most Nazis escaped.
Given that our military is enormous, the odds are that they will escape prosecution. Just like the overwhelming majority of Nazis did.
The media is actually sanewashing Trump-- look at their coverage of his "third term". They are a huge part of the problem.
Of course, that was true before his open & driven lust for Greenland, which started in Trump 1.0 & has heated up to the point of raping Denmark/Greenland.
🙂
They would probably win such a conflict, but it would leave them weakened and alone.
As for the rest, WWII included, they didn’t fight alone. If the orange dick invaded Greenland, nobody except his corrupt buddies in Moscow and Tel Aviv are going to support him.
Even after all their adventurism they still don’t understand how impossible it is to take a country that doesn’t want to be taken.
1). They have certainly “won” wars in the most basic sense
2) They cannot hold the possessions from the wars they win without buy-in from the populace. Eg. Japan, Germany.
Like I said, I get the sentiment but accuracy matters.
It’s a miracle that Iran hasn’t bombed US, with the constant provocation, uh, I mean diplomacy.
🤑🤑
The lying traitor to the US and the West.
I never wanted this to happen.
Asteroid, Zero In on the USA.
so so so sad. He's making the world hate us. Many of us, (democrats love people,)
Fuck fascism. Please don't hate all of us. We're trying to fix it. We need so much help.
The only difference now is that under Trump you're attacking your own military allies too, all while cuddling up to that another bully in the Kremlin.
The maniac must be stopped.
LoL until it actually happens, then they are chicken s***.
if we're talking about civilians with small arms going up against Reaper drones, F-22s, Abrams tanks, and Apache helicopters.
I can't see the dictator in chief allowing people to have guns that could remove him and his rich friends.
Trump isn’t talking about invading Canada because a going to invade Greenland, trigger NATO’s Article 5, and then invade Canada ANYWAY.
To talk about it would cause Canada to arm up, but he’s going soften us economically first, but invade anyway 😩
They have gutted and alienated the Military (VA), Logistics (Gov't), Finance (Markets), and Intelligence services.
Installing loyalty and firing competency in leadership is having predictable results (failure), with unpredictable effects.
yes they are that dumb
He hasn’t been cleared to invade any country but he is being reviewed for termination due to multiple violations of the law and Constitution.
Thank you.
So who is driving this insane 'presidential desire' I wonder🤔
Just who else would do this🤔
The right answer is most often the obvious answer you just don't want to accept.
I asked this in another thread. US is in NATO. But at this point they are also being aggressive to two NATO members.
Congress would have to agree to an act of war with Greenland.
The president acting alone, declaring war on Greenland, would be an illegal act.
As a veteran: we are asked to do things we don't agree with all of the time in the name of war.
It isn't always apparent what constitutes an "illegal order" in the moment.
This will be no different, and they will obey orders.
Repeat as needed.
Duty is to the Constitution of the United States.
Nobody gives a hoot about an old piece of paper. It's the loved ones back home that you fight for.
This is something America could never come back from, even post-Trump.
And if it works, he'll do the same to Canada- bit by bit.
Let's face it.
He will chip away at boundaries (moral, ethical, political, and physical) as much as possible. Expanding his power.
Thankfully he is older.
Meaning the US would have in between 5,000 - 20,000 dead americans in the first few weeks. And not a single shot would have been fired by the danes.
Admittedly, pig pancreas' supply is not something they will have thought about, though.
The danes could simply sit back, put their feet on the table and wait for the US to either withdraw or capitulate.
No way in hell the american people would be willing to pay this much of a price in blood.
Watch him scream and whinge when thousands of Americans start dying because they can’t get insulin. Thousands of fat Trump supporters.
Why don’t they?
Democrats must stop hiding and waiting. They need to take noisy public stands. Force the GOP members to defend the insanity. That’s what opposition looks like when you don’t hold the levers of power. Inspire the base. Build confidence.
This is no time to be passive.
https://bsky.app/profile/doiredoire.bsky.social/post/3llk5d6bygc2q
I suppose it means nothing if you feel free to ignore treaties.
Technically, if you want to get right down to brass tacks, same time, same day, 2021.
At this point, he will NEVER be held accountable. It's too late now.
We’re so, so sorry.
It must’ve felt like your peaceful Arctic sanctuary got ding-dong ditched by the ghost of empires past.
https://aiwillybillhuman.substack.com/p/dear-greenland-dont-cut-a-deal-with
Put French nukes there in it's place
In: the Indian wars
Fire????
He doesn't care about the people of Greenland.
This is insane.
(No reason given)
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/20/israelis-cheer-gaza-bombing
My sympathy and support would be solely with the people of Greenland and Denmark
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Thompson_Jr.
If he weren't threatening military force, he would have said that we're not going to do that, not that we wouldn't need to based on hope for compliance.
porque quieres anexar a Groenlandia?
maldito hijo de tu maldita madre