Our numbers likely aren't large enough even if we turn out in large numbers to win in 2026, presuming semi-free and fair elections.
We need a bigger tent that will pick up folks disaffected from Trump but we've got to figure out how to tolerate some points of view we don't share.
We need a bigger tent that will pick up folks disaffected from Trump but we've got to figure out how to tolerate some points of view we don't share.
Comments
Non-negotiables are protecting the 3 Crown Jewels of our social safety net: Medicare/Medicaid/Social Security.
Last thing I want is some Silicon Valley “Cargo Cult Centrism” taking over Democratic Party only to cut Medicaid/ Social Security.
"Throw the bums out" might be enough, but then we'll just have to white knuckle it in 2028 too bc they'll like up behind whomever the GOP finds to take the mantle.
1/3
The only analysis that works is regular media are shills and the AP are shills to shills.
Shill^2.
"The courtiers of the aristocracy are meaner than the aristocracy itself."
-- Tocqueville
Political action is always accompanied by hissing, e. g., "how *dare* he [expose my fanny as a shill]."
The converse is not true. Hissing doesn't always mean progress.