Hunter is a special prospect and if he's really a WR/CB, there's a path to QB-level surplus value, which can justify 2 1s.
The Browns need a QB in 2026-29 more than they need Hunter in 2025-28 and they can still hit LOS at 5. That 1st in 2026 could be juicy if the 2025 Jags look like the 2024 Jags.
The Browns need a QB in 2026-29 more than they need Hunter in 2025-28 and they can still hit LOS at 5. That 1st in 2026 could be juicy if the 2025 Jags look like the 2024 Jags.
Reposted from
Bill Barnwell
Seeing every take from "What an obviously stupid trade for the Jags" to "What an obviously stupid trade for the Browns" makes me think this one is pretty reasonable for both sides
Comments
I would be a bit surprised if they did, mainly because of the injury risk simply being in on so many plays
Back to paternity leave for me unless there's any more crazy challenge trades!