ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
andyt813.bsky.social
•
1 day ago
IMO everyone should have the "6-pack". Doesn't have to be graded or HOF but 51-56 is a WAY different era and quality compared to 57-present
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
mcfarm21.bsky.social
•
1 day ago
One heck of a 6 pack
0
reply
[–]
johnogden124.bsky.social
•
1 day ago
2
1
reply
[–]
andyt813.bsky.social
•
1 day ago
Excellent 👍
0
reply
[–]
desert-vinit.bsky.social
•
1 day ago
The only 51 and 52 Topps cards I have are of Monte. Agree with you that these years are special. Perhaps it was the competition.
5
2
reply
[–]
amblerrick.bsky.social
•
1 day ago
1
reply
[–]
andyt813.bsky.social
•
1 day ago
IMO Monte has arguably the best looking cards per player ever. Certainly on the short list
2
reply
[–]
atl1064.bsky.social
•
1 day ago
I don't have any 1951 Topps Red Backs in my collection but I agree 1952-56 Topps are the best.
5
reply
[–]
vossbrink.bsky.social
•
1 day ago
Needs more Bowman. :p
0
1
reply
[–]
andyt813.bsky.social
•
1 day ago
That's something I can look into. 54 Bowman Gil is what I have currently
0
1
reply
[–]
vossbrink.bsky.social
•
1 day ago
48B to 56T feels like a completely different world when compared to anything from 57 to present.
1
1
reply
[–]
andyt813.bsky.social
•
1 day ago
For sure
0
1
reply
[–]
vossbrink.bsky.social
•
1 day ago
I'll need to set up a photo tomorrow.
1
reply
[–]
gummyarts.bsky.social
•
1 day ago
4
1
reply
[–]
andyt813.bsky.social
•
1 day ago
🔥
0
reply
[–]
gwrbi-baseball-fan.bsky.social
•
1 day ago
I think I have a couple of examples of each of these, though not quite the star power!
0
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments