IF TRANS ISSUES ARE SO INCONSEQUENTIAL DOES SOMEONE ON THE NYT MASTHEAD WANT TO EXPLAIN WHY THEY SPENT THREE YEARS RUNNING A1 “INVESTIGATIONS” INTO SAFE AND EFFECTIVE MEDICAL CARE AND THE LANGUAGE CHOICES OF NON-PROFITS AND HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS???? - ThreadSky

joolia.bsky.social • 1 day ago

IF TRANS ISSUES ARE SO INCONSEQUENTIAL DOES SOMEONE ON THE NYT MASTHEAD WANT TO EXPLAIN WHY THEY SPENT THREE YEARS RUNNING A1 “INVESTIGATIONS” INTO SAFE AND EFFECTIVE MEDICAL CARE AND THE LANGUAGE CHOICES OF NON-PROFITS AND HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS????

Reposted from Toby Buckle

Of course the NYT sees the "DEI" stuff positively & is neutral on anti-trans discrimination

Comments

bahrad.bsky.social•1 day ago

They are bad people which is why it's essential to defund them by ignoring their articles or only reading them through paywall evaders that deny them revenue.

ntm.bsky.social•15 hours ago

Someone with access to the archives check to see if the NYT similarly described civil rights legislation in the 1960s as inconsequential.

esghound.com•1 day ago

I think they are admitting they are glad about it actually

https://bsky.app/profile/esghound.com/post/3ljdiaiw3lk2w

doogie2k.bsky.social•1 day ago

Four of them literally put "trans issues" on the POSITIVE side of the ledger.

thisthom.bsky.social•1 day ago

And why is it orientated towards the positive impact? What positive impact and for whom?

ahclem.bsky.social•19 hours ago

No, actually they don’t want to.

roswingrove.bsky.social•12 hours ago

“It was all that Pamela woman’s fault, and she’s gone now so….”

amateurexpertop.bsky.social•1 day ago

it's fucking "hot dog suit guy" every time i see NYT on my tl now

okinaga.bsky.social•1 day ago

Surveying 10 deadeyed transphobic psychopaths about whether or not they care about "trans issues" then making a cute graph about it

luftkraftpikk.bsky.social•1 day ago

https://bsky.app/profile/luftkraftpikk.bsky.social/post/3ljbw2njozc2d

friendofdesoto.bsky.social•1 day ago

NYT: Sorry, we should clarify. We asked 9 mostly-old White people (and Tressie). Trans issues are inconsequential *to them*. Trans issues could be consequential for other people - who knows? Hence our sustained JAQing off. We were just so concerned and uncertain. You know, for other peoples' sake.

disky01.bsky.social•21 hours ago

Everyone who makes more then 80k at nyt should be be-headed or dismembered

davigray.bsky.social•1 day ago

bryceknittle.bsky.social•23 hours ago

This is VERY similar to what I wrote when I got my “why haven’t you renewed your membership with the PDGA email”

Disc Golf Association.

scrat3000.bsky.social•20 hours ago

What's going on with the pdga?

bryceknittle.bsky.social•19 hours ago

Oh. Very anti-trans.

scrat3000.bsky.social•19 hours ago

I wish I was surprised

bryceknittle.bsky.social•19 hours ago

This was a former president of the board. Vibes. Their attitude is slowly changing. Sslllllooooooooowwwwlllyyyy.

educatoratlarge.bsky.social•17 hours ago

https://bsky.app/profile/educatoratlarge.bsky.social/post/3lhr77ma3gk2g

realworldrj.bsky.social•1 day ago

🤷
https://bsky.app/profile/realworldrj.bsky.social/post/3ljddnsnzjk23

ebridget.bsky.social•1 day ago

Sounds like they wanted a wedge issue that also had the added bonus of getting real people hurt or killed

kelpkelpkelp.bsky.social•1 day ago

The NYT feels that trans people are only inconsequential in their total absence.

crobi.bsky.social•1 day ago

because they got paid money by the wealthy to do so.

novareinbeer.bsky.social•19 hours ago

Because they're doing the 4th Reich and we're always the first test case.

lncann.bsky.social•1 day ago

We need to panic about this thing that doesn’t affect us directly but now that people are suffering it’s really not a big deal because it doesn’t affect us directly.

Absolutely infuriating.