The problem with this claim is that we had a massive economic catastrophe in the final year of Trump’s first presidency and it literally didn’t seem to affect him much at all, and then Biden had a booming economy and people just didn’t seem to notice
Reposted from
Urban Land Rent 🚰
Stancil’s idea that nothing matters but media ecosystems is wrong and I think bird flu/ tariffs/ disruption of federal programs will prove it wrong.
People are not mindless automatons. They notice when things get expensive or friends and family can’t find work! They know who the president is!
People are not mindless automatons. They notice when things get expensive or friends and family can’t find work! They know who the president is!
Comments
“They notice when things get expensive”. Correct but who do they blame for it!? People are open to a variety of narratives when deciding the answer to that question.
Homeownership up
Lots of people saw their incomes increase with emergency measures
Incredible stock run
So if I randomly pick March 20th - Nov 5th I can show almost 100% return.
Also a quarter of the population has fled the country
This isn’t gonna just go away this time.
and last election is the result of Biden hanging on for too long, the absence of dem primaries resulting in an unpopular candidate
A deranged legacy media atmosphere pumped propaganda down the entire public's throats - and then Musk bought Twitter.
All of the "Democrat who voted for Trump" buyer's remorse anecdotes paint a picture of an economy that wasn't actually great for normal people.
That claim lost a lot of its persuasive power on November 5th
Constant doom and gloom over Biden's recovery and refusal to cover his successes, coupled with disproportionate airtime for Trump's lies and ludicrous amounts of sanewashing. Failure to inform got us here.
"What's going on matters, but not that much."
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/02/11/democrats-tricked-strong-economy-00203464