If you're going to have a personality cult, why is it always for the dumbest, most corrupt, crooked weirdos? A George Clooney cult, maybe but the orange imbecile? Incomprehensible.
It’ll mean something different day to day since he only knows what the last person he spoke with said to him. If you thought the Biden debate performance was bad, wait a couple years into Trump’s second term to see how bananas ‘the weave’ gets in press conferences.
jks aside, isn't this what CPAC's hero, Victor Orban, has done to the Hungarian courts? And won't the outcome here quickly show how far down that road we already are to Orbanism?
But according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, this was simply Trump: "Adopting a distinctive tone at odds with the sober and measured arguments more typical in Supreme Court advocacy, the brief instead touted Mr. Trump’s expertise."
This sounds like "Congress passed a law, the President signed it, it's a valid statute, and the compliance deadline was deliberately set for before the president-elect would take office. But valid law or no, it shouldn't be enforced because the president-elect doesn't like it."
Don't forget: "All existing laws should be suspended because the handsome and strong and constantly maligned by the liberal lunatic left president-elect has A MANDATE." These lackeys are all pathetic, just no self respect among them.
Comments
In: presidential intent (just this one guy, though)
Like that might actually be useful.
https://blakereid.org/section-230-of-what/