One legal issue with “Musk takes the checkbook” is that it seems like several Musk lackeys (or Musk himself) will be exercising substantial authority pursuant to public law. That’s unconstitutional, as they weren’t appointed consistent with the appointments clause or other applicable law
Reposted from
Laura Schaefer
Could any President say "I don't want their DHS with a head requiring confirmation I'm going to create my OWN DHS and I'm going to say the appointee who runs it requires no confirmation!!!! But also I need all the data and files from old DHS and any employee who signs a loyalty oath can come over"
Comments
All Federal Employees need to remember their Oath is to the Constitution. Not a random band of nerd hooligans trying to damage our country.
Will there be branded brown shirts?
How can a private citizen just take control over the entire governments payment system?
Aren't there any grounds to just arrest him?
Illegality - that’s up to a US Supreme Court now that is 4/9 guaranteed to support anything he does
#law #criminal #international
#criminal #prosecution #crimenews