Look, call me a stickler for Judicial Ethics, but I am not sure a nonpartisan, apolitical judge who is likely to hear cases involving the Trump administration should be sitting down with a club for conservative law students to discuss "DOJ AND THE WHITE HOUSE: DEFENDING PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITIES"
Comments
The President and the Attorney General (subject to the President’s supervision and control) will interpret the law for the executive branch, instead of having separate agencies adopt conflicting interpretations.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/02/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-reins-in-independent-agencies-to-restore-a-government-that-answers-to-the-american-people/
Also, dude personifies "Chad".
I AM ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE that a nonpartisan, apolitical judge who is likely to hear cases involving the Trump administration should NOT be sitting down with a club for conservative law students to discuss "DOJ and the White House: Defending Presidential Priorities" -- EVER
Of course the judge’s name is “Chad” and they’re serving Chik-Fil-A 🤢
🤦♂️
https://www.instagram.com/p/DFs868VPF74/
But, of course.
They almost all do.
Hell the 5th circuit crew are almost straight up judges for the confederacy.