NYTimes has a long history of holding conservatives—including its paid columnists, like Stephens here—to absolutely no standards whatsoever, but still worth noting the complete lack of ethics required to not mention how 99.99% of Iran's uranium stockpile was due to Trump withdrawing from JCPOA.
Comments
None!
@chrislhayes.bsky.social @chriscillizza.bsky.social
Reading, stop discussing. Treat them like newsmax or Jayson Blair
Fuck the New York Times.
“a functional nuclear weapon requires several other complex components that Iran has not demonstrably mastered.”
Healthcare: 2 weeks
Ukraine ceasefire: 2 weeks
China trade deal: 2 weeks
UFO disclosures: 2 weeks
any zionazi ideas netinyahoo has is what trump will do
I disagree.
So far, MAD has kept India & Pakistan in check. Let Iran have their nukes and the bonus would be that the Saudis and Israel would be reminded of their places in the global hierarchy.
At least we can take solace in the New York Times admitting we now don't know where 100% of Iran's uranium is...Wait, they did mention that—no?
The warmongering is off the charts and we haven't learned a got damn thing since Vietnam. It's like we have an every-20yr-biological-clock of sorts, when it comes to where to invade next...🥴
Good grief, the stupid by MAGA is impressive.