Hey, #LitigationDisasterTourists, who wants to read the Matt Gaetz Ethics Report with me?
As we do, let's keep in mind that this was a report the GOP fought hard to keep us from seeing - while Matty was being nominated for US Attorney General
As we do, let's keep in mind that this was a report the GOP fought hard to keep us from seeing - while Matty was being nominated for US Attorney General
Comments
all the best people.
But why don't we start at page 37
"Reps. Dave Joyce (R-Ohio) and Andrew Garbarino (R-N.Y.) sided with the committee's five Democrats in voting to release the report, ... /1
Like, not as in the sense of just "that's completely wrong" but in the sense of "those words do not make any sense in that combination"
- Republicans.
New York's courts have jurisdiction over people in NY; those courts can tell those people what to do, and use the force of law to compel compliance. And also over other parties before it for various reasons, like a choice
The House Ethics Committee has jurisdiction over House members and their staff, etc. - they are subject to the Committee's authority and the Committee can impose consequences on em
But "jurisdiction to release a report"? That's not a thing. You don't need authority over Gaetz to say "here
I know you didn't consciously mean it that way but maybe reflect on your word choices?
I suppose the blame for this association falls on doomsday preachers who *love* specific OT smiting stories.