ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
lolennui.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
haha cute dog with an “I voted” sticker, hope it was worth going to jail for VOTER FRAUD
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
rutrow.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
It's embryo was declared to be human before it fully formed. You can't strip citizenship away just because you're a dog.
0
reply
[–]
roseoftexas.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
There’s nothing in the rule book that says dogs can’t vote
10
reply
[–]
claudechung.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
Hey if mules can vote…
1
reply
[–]
mrthursday.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
Without strict voter ID laws, how are poll workers supposed to tell the difference between a human and a dog?
1
reply
[–]
bigkafka.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
Account to the Supreme Court, dogs can vote as long their 18 yr old at least.
0
reply
[–]
enbuenora.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
Congress can only stop dogs from voting by 2/3 vote
11
reply
[–]
omnisomni.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
Do those mayor dogs get to vote?
6
reply
[–]
kurtrisser.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
It's not voter fraud if the dog is a yellow dog Democrat.
1
reply
[–]
dhistoryman.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
Was it old enough, and if so in person years or dog years? Is it a citizen?
1
reply
[–]
carodjah.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
*Project Veritas starts shaking*
14
reply
[–]
homelessrobot.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
there's no rule that says a dog can't vote!
...oh wait I'm sorry there's actually several it's just not dog-based I was skimming the Index
3
reply
[–]
brianomite.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
an impawster
4
reply
[–]
defaultvalue.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
Sorry, I’m receiving an update that that’s Glenn Youngkin’s dog, that he was wearing TWO “I voted” stickers, and that there will be no legal consequences above and beyond a very stern look.
0
reply
[–]
seangmc.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
the law's the law
0
reply
[–]
lizardky.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
There's no law saying a dog can't vote!
Wait, there is?
1
1
reply
[–]
carodjah.bsky.social
•
448 days ago
As long as they show up with tags on their collar, they’re all set.
1
reply
[–]
wordlebacon.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
New Business Venture for Mike Lindell: MY KENNEL
0
reply
[–]
paladinawe.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
And yet canine candidates are permitted in local elections?! Can we not have them vote for their pupper peers?!
This is an outrage!
1
reply
[–]
peebeauxsmom.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
Elliott Stabler Destroyer of Worlds and The Reason We Can't Have Nice Things says it was totally worth it.
5
1
reply
[–]
ashokhotnik.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
Elliott is innocent!
1
1
reply
[–]
peebeauxsmom.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
"Innocent" is doing a LOT of heavy lifting in that declaration 😂😂😂😂😂
0
reply
[–]
glenhanlonsrazor.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
oh shit, i'm caught
0
reply
[–]
jtadetroit.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
If it was a Chihuahua, it just shows why one party is not guarding the border.
1
reply
[–]
petestaiano.com
•
449 days ago
Get their ass
0
reply
[–]
gerigent.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
The important unanswered question is whether this was a migrant dog?
1
reply
[–]
onedogsopinion.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
Each dog vote counts as seven human votes. Welcome to the Dog Resistance
11
reply
[–]
davis.social
•
449 days ago
As @darthbluesky.bsky.social would say,
INNOCENT!
0
reply
[–]
lukegriffin.bsky.social
•
449 days ago
People are always like ‘my dog is so smart’ while their dopey mutt does shit like this
0
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments
...oh wait I'm sorry there's actually several it's just not dog-based I was skimming the Index
Wait, there is?
This is an outrage!
INNOCENT!