Enjoyed this. Different vibe than I got from reading a live skeet thread.

Looking ahead, how does the 30% threshold play with a tailoring analysis? Seems arbitrary to me.
Reposted from Chris Geidner
This was one of those arguments that I was very glad to be in the courtroom to report on. It's not always possible from audio to gather as well (or, sometimes, at all) how the justices are in conversation with one another. Today seemed a key day when watching helped a lot. Here's my Law Dork report:

Comments