Sadly, is not a government decision, is a law based decision in a court. Government an politics still are old fuckin geezers connected with weird cults who refuse to listen normal people
Now all we them to do is to merge with Brazil so they can begin WW3 and merge all countries into a single Federation and create space colonies and treat the people in there like crap until a certain individual in Side-3 begins a revolutionary movement called the Principality of Zeon
The Tokyo high court made the ruling, the second prefectural high court to do so after Sapporo. It's still not made its way to the national high courts and even then, will probably be rejected unfortunately.
idk if it'll be rejected by SCOJ, but the non opinion part is spot on (it IS not the SCOJ that ruled it was unconstitutional, which is kinda what this implies. Still a nice win!)
I hope they will, but given their insistence on holding onto old restoration and post war western laws that we've since abandoned, I don't hold great hope.
Then again, the LDP getting bitch slapped at the election may give a little more nudge to social policy movement. Who knows.
I'm pretty sure none of the people in question refer to white gay people as 'OMG real life slash'. If they do, apologies, that just makes them extremely weird instead of racist. But if they only do this to japanese people the only discernible reason is because they are Japanese.
Not quite, unfortunately until Japan's Supreme Court weighs in on it there is no requirement to change the law. The high court also upheld a lower court decision that the plaintiffs should not be awarded damages, as the government is not yet compelled to change the law.
So high court is misleading? Would the high court here be analogous to a US circuit court?
If this goes to the supreme Court in Japan do they have similar authority for judicial review as the US supreme Court? Or does the Constitutionality of this question end up being decided somewhere else?
Yeah, somewhat analogous to the circuit courts. This was a ruling from the High Court of Tokyo, the Sapporo High Court made a similar ruling in March. I'm not really sure where it goes next, I am not an expert and just regurgitating stuff I've read on this ruling and the one from Sapporo
They have a bunch of right wing people like the weebs here, also their own form of woke. Its like here but in their very own way, japanese language is such a big barrier to go through and understand it
this is to be cross referenced with marriage benefits, customs behind a written copulant relationship as well as simple constitutional debriefing about thevalue of the human and it's constituents be it land and family.
Comments
https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2024-10-30/a-second-high-court-rules-that-japans-ban-on-same-sex-marriage-is-unconstitutional
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/10/30/japan/crime-legal/same-sex-ruling-unconstitutional/
Then again, the LDP getting bitch slapped at the election may give a little more nudge to social policy movement. Who knows.
https://apnews.com/article/japan-same-sex-marriage-court-ruling-6005ae890fdc7fd176ce72b57a1f7d99
https://www.youtube.com/live/pyYiXLLDj3k?si=jorw5ZmR4VVZ6fUs
AnyOne Who Thinks Nippon Is Some Doomed Land Is Stuck Under A Rock.
(Plus, Much Of The "LeftWing" Hate Comes From Corporate-Beneficiaries, So Beware.)
If this goes to the supreme Court in Japan do they have similar authority for judicial review as the US supreme Court? Or does the Constitutionality of this question end up being decided somewhere else?
Thas good news~!
📍Butte, Montana
Let's. Fucking. GOOOOOOOO!