It would be good for Australians if Paul Brereton, the head of the #NACC, bothered reading his own legislation.

That would be helpful and oooh I dunno, might be something the public expected from him in his ~$758,000 a year position
Reposted from Rick Morton
Brereton always defines corruption as typically being engaged in "for a private benefit" which is explicitly NOT what his own Act requires. They even have a clause saying: "Conduct involving a public official may be corrupt conduct even if the conduct is not for the person’s personal benefit."

Comments